It's only mixed if you believe that an average of analysts' estimates is a significant metric. I believe it's a wad of old chewing gum scraped off various sidewalks and about as useful to an investor.
This report was all good. The only number that bothers me in the slightest is the cost of borrowing going up by 6 bp and being over 1.0% in the first place. I'm a little surprised it isn't well under 1.0%.
And, how did Zacks' come up with different leverage numbers than those in the AGNC PR?