Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

American Capital Agency Corp. Message Board

  • just4_youz just4_youz Mar 11, 2013 6:33 PM Flag

    FSC PSEC AND ARR.....DOGS!!! UNDER PERFORMERS AND NOT EVEN AT S & P BENCHMARK PERFORMANCE.

    It's so funny to read the posts of these right wing trading experts.... Too funny. Arr has a horrible return on assets. Look to the long term performance of these dogs. Geez. You guys called this a " treacherous market". How ill-informed. This is one of the greatest and easiest markets ever. In history. Look to the facts. What a solid market....up for years. 4 year bull run. Record low vix. If you can't get double digit like 15% without all the voodoo trading formulas offered by these constant pumper/bashers here. Please. You shouldn't invest in stocks. And doc and company will only cost you...$$$$$$ lots of money. Look to a chart. Find the facts. These boiler room sales jockies are too busy....trading to make profits. Poor performers brought forward by you know who!!!!!

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • It's so funny to read the posts of these right wing trading experts.... Too funny. Arr has a horrible return on assets. Look to the long term performance of these dogs. Geez. You guys called this a " treacherous market". How ill-informed. This is one of the greatest and easiest markets ever. In history. Look to the facts. What a solid market....up for years. 4 year bull run. Record low vix. If you can't get double digit like 15% without all the voodoo trading formulas offered by these constant pumper/bashers here. Please. You shouldn't invest in stocks. And doc and company will only cost you...$$$$$$ lots of money. Look to a chart. Find the facts. These boiler room sales jockies are too busy....trading to make profits. Poor performers brought forward by you know who!!!!!

    • Ive got all three of those names and several other divi stocks. FSC and ARR have been disapointing in cap appreciation, PSEC has been ok.

      Its been a good ride off mar 09, but dont forget the treachery of the flash crash or the post SnP cut debacle.

      Reits_r_us can enthuse the impulsive to lose vast sums, but he is not aware of it.

      • 3 Replies to herexhear
      • Quite amusing how you change from all caps and shorthand to all lower case and lofty vocab.
        My question, don't you have something better to do?
        All the different accounts you opened, all the posts, saying nothing really.
        always making sure herexhear responds so as not to be accused...
        Only a child would go to all that time and trouble, an adult would just go elsewhere.
        Think about it...

        And here we are here talking stocks, options , in the name of making money.
        What are you doing- besides trolling? in the name of what?

        It must be hard for you, being short in stature, unsuccessful in career, feeling the world owes you something...eh? This must seem like some form of success for you.

      • Hfft101,

        I love the way your Mr Hide(sp intended) persona does the headline and then your small cap(on meds) Dr Jerkyll(sp intended), comes out to give you the only support you receive on this board. You really must have been bullied as a kid to have ALL of these one and two history ID's giving you your support. I bet you played a lot of solitaire as a kid...;-)

        Now, regarding the 5 stocks I selected...MAIN, FSC, PSEC, ARR and CFP. You fail, small surprise, to understand the nature of probability. Capital loss, such as a 32% loss in PPS in CFP over the past 3 years sounds pretty bad, right?

        My model could not care less about capital appreciation. It is all about monthly cyclic probability. While you were losing your shirt on bad stocks over that period, my model on CFP, for example, returned 7.58 or 92.6% or over 30% annually. That's right. While the stock lost over 10% annually my model returned 30% annually.

        Again, CA has nothing to do with making money. It is the edge of probability, a model strictly obeyed, that take advantage of your edge and trading without fear, realizing with each trade you could lose, but over time, probability wins.

        Same deal with AGNC right now. We are trading with the edge of probability, that AGNC has a run to EX during the last two weeks 90+% of the time. Can we lose on any given trade..YES, like last Q. But if you keep trading the same amount in a mechanical model, probability will ultimately win out.

        Do I care as a trader if AGNC goes to 25. NO. All I care for is a predictable run over the two weeks I am in the market, over 90% of the time.

        I must be going crazy myself thinking a rational explanation will be understood by a psychotic.

        Flame on brother. I wrote a post grad dissertation on multiple personality disorder, I get it...;-)

        DocReits

      • I'm thinking you just replied to yourself.

 
AGNC
20.75+0.11(+0.56%)May 1 4:00 PMEDT