Mon, Jul 28, 2014, 11:21 AM EDT - U.S. Markets close in 4 hrs 39 mins

Recent

% | $
Click the to save as a favorite.

Alcoa Inc. Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • notarethug notarethug Nov 16, 2006 9:26 AM Flag

    Social Security, Anyone?

    Anybody who is receiving SS now or who hopes to receive SS in the future should resist the Republicans' deceptive privatization schemes with every fiber of his/her being. In 2005 the SS budget surplus was $171.8 Billion, up from $156 Billion the year before. The SS trust fund now stands at over $2.0 trillion as a result of surpluses resulting from the Clinton-Gore economic miracle of the 1990's.

    Republican propoganda for privatization is based upon extremely pessimistic projections of what might happen 40+ years from now. Over the past 10 years or so, only the optimistic projections by the SS trustees have been accurate. Given the Bush administration's consistent failure to predict budget deficits accurately even 1 year in advance, no voter should place any credibility in any SS privatization scheme concocted by BushCo.

    The cost of administering SS is almost exactly 1.0% of the amount paid out. Mutual funds have expenses of 0.5% to 3% per year. Add on the administrative expense of maintaining private accounts, you will understand why any privatization scheme will be MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE than our existing SS system.

    SS has not missed paying a check in its entire existence. Why monkey around with SS when it has a perfect record? The stock market's record is less than perfect as exemplified by the downtturns of 2001-2004, 1987, 1929-1937, ad infinitum. What more information do you need to be convinced that the only threat to SS is the Republicans' screwball privatization schemes?

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Thanks for the history lesson. How about the future? You know, when the baby boomers start collecting SS? When that happens the only way to pay for SS going forward will be with increased taxes. But that's OK with you libdem's, right? That's preferable to looking for a solution that avoids tax increases, right?

      BTW, there is no cash in the SS trust fund...all IOU's. Try spending that "$2.0 trillion" without raising taxes.

      • 2 Replies to dobre_shunka
      • <the only way to pay for SS going forward will be with increased taxes>

        Bush is the only elected politician who advocates increased SS taxes. No Democrat agrees with his hare-brained scheme to screw the middle and lower classes by increasing their SS tax.

        Yes, in some future year hopefully more than a few decades from now it will probably be necessary to reduce the rate of growth of SS payments. Until then we should all be telling BushCo to keep their greedy hands off the SS trust fund.

      • Your response made no attempt to defend the Republicans' screwball privatization schemes. Should I understand from your post that you agree SS privatization is a terrible idea whose time has come and gone with the defeat of Rick Santorum and other Republican SS haters in the 2006 election?

 
AA
16.75+0.190(+1.15%)11:20 AMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.