OK, so on 1/17/13 fleet summary report out of service days increased by a net of 205 day, including 253 days to reactivate the Sedco 712 in anticipation of potential contracts. What's wrong with this when on 2/14/13 flees summary report show that Sedco 712 was awarded a 3 yrs. contract worth $416 million as anticipated? Also, on 2/14/13 fleet summary report show a net 136 days due to shipyard accelaration into 2013 from 2014 on the GSF Galaxy !. This is a wash since it is pay nor or later, right? I don't see anything wrong. Anyone?