her new book is titled
The demon is a mob, and the mob is demonic. The Democratic Party activates mobs, depends on mobs, coddles mobs, publicizes and celebrates mobs—it is the mob. Sweeping in its scope and relentless in its argument, Demonic explains the peculiarities of liberals as standard groupthink behavior. To understand mobs is to understand liberals.
Liberal Groupthink: “The same mob mentality that leads otherwise law-abiding people to hurl rocks at cops also leads otherwise intelligent people to refuse to believe anything they haven’t heard on NPR.”
Liberal Schemes: “No matter how mad the plan is—Fraternité, the ‘New Soviet Man,’ the Master Race, the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution, Building a New Society, ObamaCare—a mob will believe it.”
Liberal Enemies: “Instead of ‘counterrevolutionaries,’ liberals’ opponents are called ‘haters,’ ‘those who seek to divide us,’ ‘tea baggers,’ and ‘right-wing hate groups.’ Meanwhile, conservatives call liberals ‘liberals’—and that makes them testy.”
Liberal Justice: “In the world of the liberal, as in the world of Robespierre, there are no crimes, only criminals.”
Liberal Violence: “If Charles Manson’s followers hadn’t killed Roman Polanski’s wife, Sharon Tate, Clinton would have pardoned him, too, and he’d probably be teaching at Northwestern University.”
Citing the father of mob psychology, Gustave Le Bon, Coulter catalogs the Left’s mob behaviors: the creation of messiahs, the fear of scientific innovation, the mythmaking, the preference for images over words, the lack of morals, and the casual embrace of contradictory ideas.
Coulter traces the history of the liberal mob to the French Revolution and Robespierre’s revolutionaries (delineating a clear distinction from America’s founding fathers), who simply proclaimed that they were exercising the “general will” before slaughtering their fellow citizens “for the good of mankind.”
Similarly, as Coulter demonstrates, liberal mobs, from student radicals to white-trash racists to anti-war and pro-ObamaCare fanatics today, have consistently used violence to implement their idea of the “general will.”
This is not the American tradition; it is the tradition of Stalin, of Hitler, of the guillotine—and the tradition of the American Left.
As the heirs of the French Revolution, Democrats have a history that consists of pandering to mobs, time and again, while Republicans, heirs to the American Revolution, have regularly stood for peaceable order.
Hoping to muddy this horrifying truth, liberals slanderously accuse conservatives of their own crimes—assassination plots, conspiracy theorizing, political violence, embrace of the Ku Klux Klan. Coulter shows that the truth is the opposite: Political violence—mob violence—is always a Democratic affair.
Surveying two centuries of mob movements, Coulter demonstrates that the mob is always destructive. And yet, she argues, beginning with the civil rights movement in the sixties, Americans have lost their natural, inherited aversion to mobs. Indeed, most Americans have no idea what they are even dealing with.
Only by recognizing the mobs and their demonic nature can America begin to defend itself.
Don't forget "Pud-Qbear-Clanism".
There is a mini mob of these treasonist low life right here on this message board to deal with, who will stop at nothing to censor opposing speech.
The chief method of hiding the intellectual bankrupcy of their shallow positions being character assassination of anyone with opposing viewpoints.
How much more anti American can it get than opposing free speech?
“No matter how mad the plan is—Fraternité, the ‘New Soviet Man,’ the Master Race, the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution, Building a New Society, ObamaCare—a mob will believe it.”
the liberal has a long pedigree streching back to the post Monarchial World
nationalism, republicanism, anti clericism, Protestant 'Reawakenings' and continuing sect generation, the technological breakthroughs accompanied by the development of the social sciences - all leading to some 'progressives' to become convinced that all of Man's problems and even Man himself could be reformed to something new and improved - something that was scientifically based (this led to both Marxism and science based racism)
whereas their oppoenents believe in the inherent rational faculty of the individual man, the 'Natural Rights' of the individual Man, the self responsibility of the individual Man ---- ironically this philosophy is best described as 'classical or neo liberalism' but American political vocabulary is in some respects the exact opposite of what the rest of the world uses
you'll suk anybody's dik to keep what little you've stolen, won't you? told you, you don't have immunity, your own people will consume you.
don't come to me, STUPID!!
you have no morals, no ethics, no priciples, just other people ideas. you need to get out in the world. go do a little walkabout, try the experience method for once in your life.
more importantly what SPECIFICALLY is it you have that you fear losing so badly?
going to the director's opening of
i was there, where were you? a little bubble holding daddies frightened hand, being indoctrinated w/ fear?
"leads otherwise intelligent people to refuse to believe anything they haven’t heard on NPR."
that is Mrs. Finkelstein
and then there is the Mr. who loves AlterNet, Prison Planet and any other place that feeds him
however, i am guilty of the same 'sourceing crime' - the MSM holds little to no credibility to me - fanatics like us need our fuel and we web search for it until we find it
sourcing will prejudice me, for example i'm undecided about Net Neutrality - but since i know the primary supporters of NN are leftist i am suspicious - the 'free market' solution is to nationalize the cabling (or force a breakup isolating the hardware) thus enabling the people to prohibit the gubmit from getting involved in contet supply and access