LOL! That's a good question, Jim. It has been very well (and very poorly) answered on this board many times. But, a clear answer to that will lead you to other questions like “what are the current implications of his express statements on the topic back in his original ruling?” and “regardless of why he didn't award damages before, or what he or the SC has said, what might damages reasonably be now?”, and finally, of course, "regardless of what damages might reasonably be awarded now, what will Parsons award?"
Basically, it never ends… SIGA is a riddle, wrapped in a conundrum, boxed in an enigma.