This stock is actually LOWER than where it was in 1998. Can you believe that? You'd be HARD pressed to find any company, that is still in business, that has had a WORSE performance than that. This is unacceptable. And, Rose keeps his job? Gets paid millions?? That CFO clown Dan Luckshire keeps his job? How can we stand for this as shareholders?? They're the ONLY ones that have made any money off of this company in 16 YEARS! Just unbelievable.
If you think it's hard to find a company that has done worse than this then you don't know very much.
(I know you said "still in business", but that's a pretty stupid exception - you're accusing people of being the worst, but saying you're not going to count all the people who have failed.)
In addition, stock price is a poor measure for performance; stock prices are driven by external forces having nothing to do with management performance.
You're insistence on using stock price as a measuring tool is (in a way that is too complicated for you to understand) the reason you will never accomplish anything in life. Enjoy your poverty, troll..
Wow, you have GOT to be the most ignorant poster I've ever read. First you say a stock price isn't an indicator of performance?? How long have you been investing in the market now? If I were you, I wouldn't look at my 401K balance. How can you POSSIBLY say that with ANY seriousness?!? Either you're stupid, or actually an employee of SIGA....although those go hand in hand.
Too complicated for me to undertand...funny....I guess all along I was confused and thought you invested in a stock with hopes of price appreciation and/or dividends. What a crazy world I'm living in.
Lastly, I REALLY REALLY know what an ignorant moron you are because anyone that would make a statement about poverty is just an arrogant fool (1) because that is a serious issue and (2) it's pretty stupid to make assumptions about people's wealth levels on the internet. How do you know my wealth is not 10X that of yours??
Trust me, chart ALMOST any company over the last two years vs. SIGA and you tell me which stock you would have owned. I guess you don't like investing in a solid company with good management.....probably because you are management. But getting wealthy by basically milking a company and robbing the investors isn't a very noble prospect.
The ONLY reason that this company has not "failed" totally is because the US taxpayers, through BARDA, gave them a $480 million dollar one time contract four years ago. They have NO other customers or prospects that they have disclosed thus far. What other company can you think of that has had one customer and one contract in four years and is still in business?
Siga.... I'm just waiting for my $2.91 entry again to make another quick flip. This has been a great performing stock for management Drod. They get free shares....Dumped millions when it was around $14, and then even as the stock went down, they kept giving themselves below market priced options that they flipped for quick profits. What's not to like?
Can management help it if we actually paid real money out ofour hard earned incomes and savings to buy
the stock? LOL!
Yeah, but on a very serious note, you'd think they'd be thrown out on their @sses by now by the shareholders, or at least they'd start to make a rucus, considering what has gone on. I mean, WHAT is wrong with the avg SIGA shareholder?? Are they a masochist group or something??
You saying that PIP lined his pockets? Not entirely unrealistic, but it's quite a stretch. I'd be more inclinded to believe that SIGA's management didn't know what the F they were doing and how to protect themselves, and basically got conned by smarter folks.