Fri, Aug 29, 2014, 6:15 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

SIGA Technologies, Inc. Message Board

  • sigakingone sigakingone Mar 15, 2014 4:19 PM Flag

    Delaware Courts May Award Expectation Damages for a Breach of an Obligation to Negotiate in Good Faith C. Stephen Bigler, Jennifer Veet Barrett


    In that connection, the Supreme Court held that “where the parties have a Type II preliminary agreement to negotiate in good faith, and the trial judge makes a factual finding, supported by the record, that the parties would have reached an agreement but for the defendant’s bad faith negotiations, the plaintiff is entitled to recover contract expectation damages.” Further, the court found that the factual conclusions made by the Court of Chancery support a finding that the LATS was a Type II preliminary agreement and that SIGA and Pharmathene could not, in good faith, propose terms of the definitive licensing agreement that were inconsistent with the LATS. Because this was the first time the Delaware Supreme Court addressed whether Delaware law recognizes Type II preliminary agreements or whether a plaintiff is entitled to recover expectation damages in connection with a breach of an obligation to negotiate a definitive agreement in good faith, the Supreme Court reversed the Court of Chancery’s damages award for reconsideration consistent with its ruling. 

    The Court of Chancery has not yet ruled on whether Pharmathene is entitled to expectation damages as a result of SIGA’s breach of its obligation to negotiate in good faith. Since the case has been remanded, the Court of Chancery has permitted the parties to reopen the record to allow Pharmathene to introduce a limited amount of evidence regarding the profits SIGA has generated on ST-246 over the past seven years since the case was filed and to allow SIGA to respond to such evidence. Delaware courts calculate expectation damages based on the reasonable expectations of the non-breaching party at the time of the breach. The court, therefore, has expressed doubt about whether such new evidence will ultimately be relevant to its decision on the damage award. 

    Read it again five times.

    Long and Strong

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

    This topic is deleted.
    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • " The court, therefore, has expressed doubt about whether such new evidence will ultimately be relevant to its decision on the damage award. "

      Especially since Parsons devoted 28 pages as to why he was unable to determine expectancy damages
      at the time of the "alleged breach",NWAMLN?

      No expectancy damages?
      What to do?
      Reliance damages at the time of the "alleged breach"?
      One buck($1)?
      Two months to pull one out of his hat?

      Watch and enjoy.......FLIX!


      Sentiment: Strong Buy

1.350.00(0.00%)Aug 29 3:59 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.