% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Permanent Portfolio Message Board

  • caponsacchi caponsacchi May 16, 2012 7:56 PM Flag

    Buffett scores again.

    No one has invited more controversy than the Oracle with his repeated dismissals of gold as an investment. And as today's Wall Street Journal points out, "since early March 1982 Berkshire shares are up roughly 22700%, versus 372% for gold." Today's another case in point. Buffett's fund (BRK-B, on the NY exchange), is up far more than the S&P500 is down while PF is down considerably more than the S&P is down. Of course, there are other funds that can be counted on to hold tight in a volatile market--Yachtman (YAFFX) and Parnassus (PRBLX) are two. But most fund managers can't match let alone beat the market averages. Consequently, an equally strong case can be made for dirt-cheap index funds like Schwab's SWPPX and SCHB, which not only have outrageously low fees (.09 and .07%), but allow you to invest small amounts with no transaction fees, practically a surefire way not to lose money in any market if you cost-average.

    The problem with gold is that supply soon catches up with demand and there's too much of the inessential metal on hand to command ever-rising prices. Still, it makes sense to have 5% gold and/or silver in your portfolio, and PF, with its large commitment to Treasuries, has proven it can level out the bumps better than funds like GLD and IAU.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
37.80+0.16(+0.43%)Aug 28 6:25 PMEDT