dy have it all
over their eyes), but the CC *was* disappointing, to
say the least. Just be honest with yourself, for
I've been saying for a long time that there's no money
to be made in small (phone) cells, that the only way
to go is to focus on larger, flatter laptop or
Palm-sized cells. Now we have the promise (well, we've had
it on their site for the last 2 years, unchanged and
not updated), but there being no second source, who
will bite the product? Catch 22.
asking, what? All these little patents with not a single
blocking one? Which one do you think effectively prevents
practicing of the technology? What about those umpteen other
licensees? Do you seriously think the licensor and the
others would just happily sit there and watch?
Bracketing and clustering?--yeah, jackrabbits around
I just hope that at the SM we will
hear a little more of "yesterday", not "next quarter",
and that it will generate some worthwhile and
strongly positive news to justify the recent run-ups of
VLNC, ULBI, LITH... <G>
What did you expect?? It was the same tone as the
calls when the stock was at $4, $5, $7, $10. Except now
we have large institutional stockholders that have
researched the potential. Beta testing laptop
batteries...focusing on large battery market...new machinery.
Contracts... a respectable stock price.....
getting close to "charlatan" status
This is what I hate most about message boards..
An open forum for opinions and we get sh*t like
Iconhater.. I am still strong on VLNC but would like MKT's
question answered.. Is anyone here REALLY pleased with the
CC? Can anyone here be honest enough to admit it
wasn't what most of us were expecting, (including
myself). How many of us were expecting something concrete?
And don't give me any of the small time investor
crap, new investor crap, or you are a piece of crap
garbage.I've been here as long or longer than most..RSR
What is your position in this company? I'd like
to understand where you coming from with regard to
Valence. If you are short, when did you short the stock?
You claim to be so knowledgeable in Valence's
business you really should go apply for a job there. You
could have saved them so much time in developing the
smartest business strategy.
Since I'm asking you,
I am long and have been since 7. I've got no
complaints, how about you?
Obviously you sold your shares and are looking
"..there's no money to be made
in small (phone) cells..."
Lev didn't say
that, YOU DID. He said margins on larger batteries were
Their patents WILL block other OEM's. You may have
technical knowledge about battery chemistry but you don't
know anything about the application of patent law.
Interesting that folks are "disappointed" that
Hanil is not commercially producing, yet. I say this
because Hanil's own estimate, made 6 mos ago, has been
for production to commence in March of this year. My
guess, April or May, latest. Another Hanil topic; Hanil
brokered a contract for cellphone batteries. Now, THAT is
interesting. WAG, we're going to hear more about contracts,