Any news????
Following from PDX Oregonian:
AFTER HOT
GROWTH, PRIVATIZATION OF PRISONS SLOWS.
The lack
of big savings promised over government run prisons
and fewer criminals are among the reasons for the
slowdown.
By JOSEPH T. HALLINAN Newhouse News
Service
The nation's largest private prison company, the
Corrections Corporation of America, has begun pulling up
stakes in the country's largest private prison market,
Texas.
It voluntarily quit running, in 1998 at least three
prisons there, a small but telling omen in an industry
grappling with change.
When private prisons first
appeared in 1984, the companies that ran them promised big
savings over government-run prisons.
But now, some
of the savings aren't as big as officials had been
led to believe. In some cases, the savings are less
than 7 cents on the dollar
This, along with
other factors, has cooled one of the hottest trends in
prisons - privatization. After years of breakneck growth,
expansion is slowing and stock prices are flat or
falling.
"You can't be a fledgling start-up forever,� said
Peggy Lawrence, vice president of investor relations
for the company, whose once-hot stock has taken a
beating.
There are several reasons for the slowdown. Chief among
them is fewer criminals. In December, the federal
government announced that violent and property crimes hit
their lowest level since 1973. And fewer crimes
generally means fewer convicts
"I guess the bottom
line is, there's a bit of a slowdown in the number of
inmates we've been receiving," said Larry Todd, a
spokesman for the Texas Department of Criminal
Justice
Effect disproportionate
Texas is the biggest
private prison user in the nation, swamping every other
state. So a slowdown there has a disproportionate effect
on the private prison industry.
Of the 142
private prisons and, jails in operation in 1997, 41 of
them -29 percent - were in Texas.
Fourteen of
those facilities were run by Corrections Corporation of
America until Dec. 31. But the company stopped running at
least three of those facilities, Lawrence said, as
competition drives down the company's profits.
At the
end of 1997, private prisons housed about 71,000
inmates, or' about 4 percent of the nation's prison and
jail population.
These facilities were built on
a singular concept: Private is cheaper. But
figuring out how much cheaper has been difficult. Industry
estimates vary widely. Corrections Corporation of America,
which runs 72 prisons in the United States, cites
savings numbers ranging from 5 percent to 20
percent.
But the federal government, in a 1996 report, said it
could not conclude based on the evidence, whether
private prisons save any money at all.
The report,
by the General Accounting Office, reviewed five
studies that compared costs of public and private
prisons.
In four of the comparisons examined the GAO found
that two showed no significant differences in cost one
showed a 7 percent difference in favor of the private
prison; and another showed that the private prison was
more expensive than one public prison but cheaper than
another.
The fifth study reported that private prisons saved
14 percent to 15 percent But the GAO discounted'
These results because the comparison was based on
hypothetical public prisons, not real ones.
completely accurate with regard to the three
facilities CCA
"stopped running" in Texas. TDCJ (Texas
Department of Criminal
Justice) will sign a management
contract for one year, with
three to five extensions.
However, they have (and do) exercise
their right to
re-bid the contract at any time. CCA "lost" the
contract for a big county jail near Dallas and a state
jail
(maybe two) simply because TDCJ exercised
their right
to re-solicit.
Incarceration
costs as much as $75 per day per inmate.
Up until
now, most private firms have been able to beat state
operating costs by $10-20 per inmate per day. It is an
incredibly cut-throat business, and I would not be surprised
if TDCJ received back channel pressure from other
companies
claiming to be able to meet or beat CCA's
price. So, that part
of the article I take with a
grain of salt.
I work for a medical services
provider which contracts with CCA.
It is a
well-organized company, professionally and efficiently
run.
It is a pleasure to work with them. We also contract
with
other correctional companies, so I have a
basis of comparison.
Currently, CCA deserves its
place at the top of the heap. I
bought some CCA
stock because of my experience with the
company.
I've been reading the CCA message board for quite a
while and
enjoy the comments. I've learned much
from this erudite group.
Growth forecasts trimmed
Florida also has
studied the issue and has reached roughly the same
conclusions as the GAO.
Charles Thomas, a professor at
the University of Florida and a leading expert on
private prisons, has scaled back his growth forecasts for
the industry, from 35 percent to 40 percent a year to
a still healthy 21 percent to 23 percent. Thomas is
a member of the board of trustees of Corrections
Corporation of America Prison Realty Trust, a prison owning
company closely affiliated with the
company.
Between the end of 1997 and June 1999, Thomas predicts 36
new prisons capable of holding nearly 30,000 inmates
will have opened. This is a 13 percent drop from the
1996 pace.
The occupancy rate of private
prisons also is slipping. According to numbers compiled
by Thomas, private prisons filled 4 percent fewer
beds in 1997 than in 1996.
Stock prices, too,
are leveling off. The stock of Corrections
Corporation of America, which traded early in 1998 for as
much as $41.50, now 2 languishes near $18.
The
stock of its archrival, Wackenhut Corrections Corp., is
doing better but still trades for about what it did a
year ago. And shares of Cornell Corrections Inc., a
leading company based in Houston, are down more than 25
percent from their peak.
But even amid this gloom,
Thomas sees light. A baby boom, he said, is expected to
push more young people into the crime-prone years, and
this will be good for the prison business.
In
addition, he said, repeat-offender laws such as "three
strikes and you're out," which imposes a life sentence
upon a third criminal conviction, will ensure
criminals stay behind bars longer.