Sun, Sep 21, 2014, 9:48 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Insmed Incorporated Message Board

  • fudfighter4 fudfighter4 Jul 28, 2013 11:46 AM Flag

    What do we have to lose by contacting the SEC?

    "As a result, it was the Staff's belief that, pursuant to the Nasdaq Listing Rules, the Company was not permitted to issue 20% or more of the Company's outstanding common shares ...

    Following communications by the Company with the Staff, on October 12, 2012, the Company received a Letter of Reprimand from the Staff ..."

    I observed at the time that we were entitled to expect Management to have a basic awareness of the underlying principle. They should seek our approval for transactions likely to dilute our ownership by 20% or greater.

    But such is their arrogance that the response has been a compound dilution of 44% at an average price of $7.05 - via two transactions in nine months, engineered so that they wouldn't have to seek our approval for either.

    Any guesses as to what might have happened to the share price if those investors instead had bought even half of the 13 million shares on the open market, during the same nine months in which an additional 5 million shares were bought by the Russell 3000 tracker funds?

    Who here would have voted in favour of even ONE premature dilution - after the Company assured us in July last year that the $20 million raised in the Hercules dilution would "extend our cash runway well into 2014"?

    All of the following have attacked me for calling for a SEC investigation into the insider trading -

    backwardpalm
    bugseypug
    cruizon
    dorianrivers21
    eastofhgwy1
    fudfabricator3
    hubby_14508
    insm_truth_teller
    jsblvbjb
    lux19insm
    mjmfrompa
    powderday420
    rehdvm2004
    rotten2matoes
    satltsasw
    terry_insm
    tessssssst
    themanfromkolob
    thisidistakenalready
    yousstupid

    I'm assuming the reason bugseypug, lux19insm and satltsasw haven't yet fully explained why they are against contacting the SEC is other demands on their time.

    And I see zero value in asking hubby_14508 to elaborate upon this -

    "im fairly certain the announcement of said investigation would absolutely hammer the pps"

    But would anybody else care to argue the case for doing nothing?

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • With regard to that statement by hubby - if there's anybody at all here who hasn't long ago dismissed him as a useless windbag, please feel free to ask him yourself for the reasons which supported such a confident prediction.

      It should go without saying that anybody with a basic awareness of valuation is likely to have put his prediction down to a complete ignorance of valuation.

    • So, "other demands on our time"....

      I think a more accurate statement for me is I'd rather not waste my time. It is what it is.

      Since you are raising such a stink about this, might I ask if YOU have contacted the SEC?

      If so, would you be so kind as to share your comments? If not, would you also be so kind as to explain why not?

      Thank you.

      PS - for what it's worth, the way in which the dilutions were done...sucked. I think had they asked permission, they were afraid it wouldn't have happened. Sometimes it's better to ask for forgiveness than permission.

      Additionally, even with the dilution, if one could back it out...and we hit $1,200 based on your very own price target some time back...we would still be looking VERY sweet.

 
INSM
13.21+0.03(+0.23%)Sep 19 4:15 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.