Tue, Nov 25, 2014, 10:36 PM EST - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Insmed Incorporated Message Board

  • insm_truth_teller insm_truth_teller Aug 17, 2013 10:04 AM Flag

    really serious by mdplanet

    Sorry, but this MB makes me laugh. Anyone who thinks that a secondary should be based upon analyst ratings is lost. These ratings are provided to help understand the longer term future of the stock and should be taken with a grain of salt as most analysts are loyal to their company and their company ONLY. They don't care about retail trader Joe.

    The run up in May was WAY overdone. Think about it, a 50+% increase since mid May and 100+% since February. What did you people expect? This thing was trading at less than $6 six months ago and you all thought it would reach $20 in a millisecond. The run up was due to anticipation of the results, nothing more. As "compelling" as they were, they were not good enough to keep the stock trading at the $12-13 level as questions still exist as to the future.

    And the secondary...look at the moving averages, about where it should have been. Please stop with these allegations and look at the big picture

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Sorry, but this MB makes me laugh. Anyone who thinks that a secondary should be based upon analyst ratings is lost. These ratings are provided to help understand the longer term future of the stock and should be taken with a grain of salt as most analysts are loyal to their company and their company ONLY. They don't care about retail trader Joe.

      The run up in May was WAY overdone. Think about it, a 50+% increase since mid May and 100+% since February. What did you people expect? This thing was trading at less than $6 six months ago and you all thought it would reach $20 in a millisecond. The run up was due to anticipation of the results, nothing more. As "compelling" as they were, they were not good enough to keep the stock trading at the $12-13 level as questions still exist as to the future.

      And the secondary...look at the moving averages, about where it should have been. Please stop with these allegations and look at the big picture

      • 1 Reply to insm_truth_teller
      • Sorry, but this MB makes me laugh. Anyone who thinks that a secondary should be based upon analyst ratings is lost. These ratings are provided to help understand the longer term future of the stock and should be taken with a grain of salt as most analysts are loyal to their company and their company ONLY. They don't care about retail trader Joe.

        The run up in May was WAY overdone. Think about it, a 50+% increase since mid May and 100+% since February. What did you people expect? This thing was trading at less than $6 six months ago and you all thought it would reach $20 in a millisecond. The run up was due to anticipation of the results, nothing more. As "compelling" as they were, they were not good enough to keep the stock trading at the $12-13 level as questions still exist as to the future.

        And the secondary...look at the moving averages, about where it should have been. Please stop with these allegations and look at the big picture
        .
        .
        .

 
INSM
14.24+0.04(+0.28%)Nov 25 4:00 PMEST

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.