Thanks for the post supporting the fact that there was contradictory information in the 2004 proxy materials.
No "conspiracy theory" just the plain simple fact that the proxy material had contradictory information and when it was brought to the company's attention it was denied. If the shareholders knew this, would it make a difference is the real question? Did it change the outcome of the vote?
As a shareholder I haven't been notification by the company that the proxy material contained this discrepancy has anyone?
Fan, Wilson and maybe Mike can't change this fact regardless of what they post. Much to their sorrow, I'd guess.