Lets put it this way, executive management should never receive a permanent increase equal to twice their annual earnings. If the BOD does that, then how can they further justify an incentive program. But sharing some of the wealth with the lower paid employees is certainly appropriate. Kelly's $5 million increase spread among the lower paid staff would have had a far greater positive impact and not met with the shareholder outrage that his "salary adjustment" did.
greengrass; Are you trying to tell me that there may be collusion going on between the B of D's and upper mgt? The kind of pay packages, salary and benefits, have always seemed suspicious to me. KK's $5 million dollar increase can't be justified with the pps down over 50% and the dividend down 70%. What did he do for such rewards? BBT had a fair profit, but nothing showed up in the dividend.