Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

mPhase Technologies, Inc. Message Board

  • joey_astro joey_astro Jul 12, 2010 8:48 PM Flag

    The nano battery

    Mphase now has the rights to the process that shuts the battery off. What we've all been waiting for.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Mapp:
      <<<camguy,
      I read 2 articles
      which praised this co alot.
      I trusted those articles, and they gave a good analysis of the product.
      Otherwise, I wouldn't had been here.
      Good or bad, time will tell. >>>
      -----------


      Articles? Or boiler room bait?

      If it's an unbiased 3rd party NEWS "ARTICLE" it will be penned by an author with NO DISCLAIMER.

      If it's a FLUFF PRESS RELEASE it is bought and paid for by mPhake....hence the purpose and meaning of a "press release" news authorized and sanctioned by the "release"(ing) party.

      If it's a PUMP PIECE made to look like an "article"...you will find a "DISCLAIMER" at the bottom...those are required by law. READ THE DISCLAIMER...what you will find is the entity behind the "article" will have a vested interest in mPhake or they are compensated by mPhake or they are entitle to trade shares of mPhake...A BIG TIME CONFLICT of INTEREST. BTW, the bait "articles" are one of the oldest tricks in pinkie and OB land.

      WELCOME TO THE JUNGLE! ....BTW, you have yet to apologize for making negative bogus statements about me.

    • You heard 'old' but once they discovered your investment in mphase they said you were too dumb to fly.

    • The articles were written by the company, dummy.

    • mark,
      they said iam too old to fly now.

    • camguy,
      I read 2 articles
      which praised this co alot.
      I trusted those articles, and they gave a good analysis of the product.
      Otherwise, I wouldn't had been here.
      Good or bad, time will tell.

    • MAPP78:
      <<<camguy,
      the problems with you guys is that when you started calling people names
      from the very first post, people will automatically think that you guys are anti-social or in with a purpose.
      People listen to others but not when you started calling them dirty names.
      This is stock trading, not a filthy-word contest of that sort.
      You are the most polite one, but not the others.
      The others irritate people alot.>>>
      -----------------------------------


      Now your issue is about name-calling? Dude, for the record, you just clumped me into an group that you defined as "anti-social" and calling others "dirty names" and being part of "a filthy-word contest".

      AGAIN YOU ARE DEAD WRONG!

      You've gone from making bogus claims about a patent and a product to attempting character assassinations at various times on me and others.

      Again, I suggest you focus on protecting and making your money AND understanding what you truly have thrown your money at with this company, instead of trying to control a silly penny stock board.

      Otherwise, some of those that you have much disdain for will be proven correct when they claim that your type are what Durando's dreams are made of....and he's a very rich man.

      Good Day

    • Tell us again how the government wouldn't issue a patent unless the success of the product was certain, then go fly your learjet you nitwit.

    • camguy,
      the problems with you guys is that when you started calling people names
      from the very first post, people will automatically think that you guys are anti-social or in with a purpose.
      People listen to others but not when you started calling them dirty names.
      This is stock trading, not a filthy-word contest of that sort.
      You are the most polite one, but not the others.
      The others irritate people alot.

    • TRUTH!!!!

    • Mapp:
      <<<camguy,
      people who don't like Ford, and they won't buy a Ford.
      You hate this co, but you keep staying here day & night, why ? >>>


      First off, again you are making accusations that you can not validate or disprove?

      Second, count up yours and my posts of the last month or more. You have far more posts than me on this board. Point being HYPOCRITCAL bogus claims do nothing to validate your claims.

      Third, I have stated, ad nauseam, that I trade this stock. I have done this for years after losing a bundle by holding long years earlier. This stock has/had a very OBVIOUS spike pattern to it, even though the overall trend was a death spiral. The spikes were created by the FLUFF PR's. You could literally set your watch by it (see 10+ year trend line). I have, also, stated the FLUFF PR's were designed to spike the share price so the CD and Warrant holders (those who gave Durando his money) could convert their units to discounted shares and immediately dump them into the market...that is EXACTLY what has happened over the years. The 10K's and 10Q's prove this.

      Now, years later this little selling of stock SCAM is talked about very openly...for the simple FACT that MANY are aware of the operation. So, it doesn't work near as well as it use to, hence Durando now proceeds to the next phase of "DEATH SPIRAL FINANCING" (look it up). That phase being massive DILUTION....i.e the 2 billion MORE shares now coming on line.

      What will be the next phase of Durando's DEATH SPIRAL FINANCING? A big ole' REVERSE SPLIT. And, as usual those who holding LONG....lose.

      See champ, while you're naivety has you hanging out on a penny stock MB making bogus claims about the patent and product...AND about other posters, I'm quietly playing the peaks and valleys of Durando's little scam....thereby MAKING MONEY!

      BTW, Ford has been around for almost a 100 years. They have had profitability with hundreds of products over the years. I use to not like Ford products...but I do now. And a Ford and mPhake analogy is beyond ridiculous as a comparison to validate OBVIOUSLY BOGUS CLAIMS.

      GLTA

    • View More Messages
 
XDSL
0.00050.0000(0.00%)11:23 AMEDT