Sun, Sep 21, 2014, 8:07 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.


  • archcrim archcrim Dec 3, 2012 10:35 AM Flag

    If SEC is suing them, then they must at least exist.....

    ....SEC should get back shareholders $$$$, IMO.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • In fact is this very good for NEP and the shareholders Let's explain: Before only the company was accused where now also managers and family are accused. Means that they probably (otherwise it should not be considered as fraude) have to pay back the money to the company and will get a penalty. Also based on such a classaction, shareholders will get a compensation. Suppose the compensation will be able to use the money the managers and family stole out of the company. Note that lawers indicate that for another fraude of another Chinese company (HQS) probably a compensation of 0.35$ p/s will be paid out to the shareholders.HQS is a company that can be compared with CNEP.

0.17510.0000(0.00%)Apr 4 3:47 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.