% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. Message Board

  • johndoolittle46 johndoolittle46 Apr 23, 2013 1:48 PM Flag

    Victoria secret

    Just in a comparison, Lulu is grossly undervalued.

    But to believe that Victoria Secret won't be able to compete with the clowns at Lululemon.

    Limited Brands- 13.95B valuation,10.97B revenues, 700M+ earnngs, 2.5% dividend,

    Lululemon- 11B valuation, 270M earnings, 600M cash

    Who would buy Lululemon over victoria secret when you compare the two. Market isn;t stupid for long.



    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • It's not about any fundamentals, it's the 24% of short-interest (7 days) on this stock. The rest of the float is just being squeezed up. It's probably just two funds trading 100-200 shares back and forth in microseconds all day long. No one has really bought this stock. It's obviously 100% squeeze, but that won't stop it from going up. The market doesn't care about valuations or we would be at SPX 750. Forget about the "valuations". It's all about too much liquidity and a squeezed float.

      • 1 Reply to plashadpobedy
      • of course it was short squeeze but for those who aren't really being squeezed because they are not laying over their head and are just adding to their short positons, the rise is a blessing.

        What rises too much WILL come down, and much more than people expect,. Not like we don;t have amazing examples of this. Apple, GMCR, NFLX, CMG, all have 50-75% retraces after these ridiculous spikes up on no fundamentals. Apple maybe is excluded from thsoe but the others are nonsense.


65.20-0.34(-0.52%)May 4 4:00 PMEDT