ch4_tycoon replied: "nope, it didn't work. Still prickish...no, maybe more douchebagish."
Then show me an example of how I could have disagreed with your post - and stated the facts behind that disagreement - and not have come across in a manner that so displeases you.
It would aid the edification of this board if we shared our UBTI experiences with EPD - to verify if EPD is [or is not] an UBTI problem in an IRA. This is my second request of you to do this. Could you at least to this - if not for me - then for the rest of the board?
If one searches the prior posting by me on this board and other MLPs, you will see that this is something I have already posted. If I need to re-port the info, then I will gladly do so after you and the several who are giving 5 star rec's to your posts first respond.
You began this thread with an attempt to aid the board with information. We can end this argument with the same kind of effort.
Yea, everybody has their own way of posting I suppose. I'm usually very blunt and tell off bashers, jerks, and boiler room bozos.... except on this board. Maybe because I don't worry about manipulation here....probably because if GS or some group messed with Dan's great-grandkids inheritance, he'd spank them and send them back to up duh street crying.
Really CH4, on a different board, I might have said something like I always felt Kayne Anderson manipulated energy stocks and I didn't trust them or the boiler rooms they employed. I'm not sure if that qualifies as prickish or douchebagish since it would have been an honest impression and not meant to insult or deceive. How would you classify it?