% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. Message Board

  • proamerica_1776 proamerica_1776 Jan 31, 2013 9:18 AM Flag

    Let’s stop subsidizing Wal-Mart

    Updated: 10:14 am, Tue Jan 22, 2013.
    Wal-Mart is the biggest retailer in the world. It boasts of having 1.2 million Americans on its payroll. Its reported annual profits are around $13 billion. So it’s safe to say that because it is so big — and so ubiquitous, and so obviously successful — the government can now stop subsidizing it.

    Let me explain: I was covering the first stop for the Progressive Caucus’ “Speak Out for Good Jobs Now” listening tour held in Minneapolis and attended by Rep. Raúl Grijalva, D-Ariz., and Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., among others. The first audience member to speak was one Girsheila Green, a young mother from Compton, Calif., who has worked for Wal-Mart for three years. Green told the crowded church how in her tenure with Wal-Mart, she has received two raises and is now a manager. She makes $9 an hour ($1 above the laughably low California minimum wage). She pulled from her pocket three cards she claimed most Wal-Mart employees at her store have: a 10 percent Wal-Mart employee discount card, her employee ID and her EBT card (what used to be called food stamps).

    She relayed that 80 percent of her store is on food stamps. I’d argue one is too many.

    It’s true Girsheila doesn’t have to work for Wal-Mart if she feels she’s not being paid enough. She can go work somewhere else. She’s not being forced to work for a wage that won’t feed her family. The same argument can be made for child labor, dangerous working conditions and other labor issues settled in the 20th century by workers standing up for their rights.

    Girsheila’s individual choice is not the issue at all. Since Wal-Mart, the largest private employer in the country, generally doesn’t pay its “associates” or “Wal-Mart family members” enough to live on, the giant multinational corporation is relying on the U.S. government to feed its employees. We, as taxpayers, pay for Wal-Mart’s cost-cutting tactics. Profit? Privatized. Nutrition? Socialized.

    Think of how many employees use their food stamp cards to buy groceries at the store where they work. It’s like a nurse having to file bankruptcy due to medical bills.

    It would be different if Wal-Mart were a struggling little startup where loyal employees believed in the company’s vision, so being temporarily paid less than an intern is understandable.

    But since Wal-Mart is by all measurements a success, it’s no longer OK for the company to benefit from government handouts. It needs to pay people who work for it like people who work for it and not like disposable volunteers in blue vests.

    Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., just-announced candidate for the GOP presidential nomination, testified in 2005 to the Minnesota Senate. She said if we eliminated the (laughably low) minimum wage, we could wipe out unemployment. Yes, instead of paying one person $8 an hour, which makes him eligible for food stamps and (in some cases) Medicaid, let’s pay eight people $1 an hour and they can be eligible for food stamps, Medicaid and General Assistance. Basically, allow the government to take care of the workforce so private industry can have the profit. This is corporate welfare. This is also corporate socialism. The government covers what Wal-Mart gets away with not covering.

    To those who enjoy Wal-Mart’s ample profits, it’s welfare check money-laundering. To those who tout “free market” principles, it’s not one of them.

    Bachmann, who hopped on the tea party bandwagon when it first rolled out on socialized roads, has decried the government even though her family farm and husband’s clinic have received government money. Bachmann denied this money has benefited her personally; her financial disclosure forms completely contradict that statement.

    Bachmann and the tea party are like a 30-year-old who lives comfortably in the family home while railing against parental tyranny and bemoaning the mediocrity of the meals his mother cooks.

    In the real world, taxpayers should stop subsidizing Wal-Mart’s low wages. Let them pay their employees a living wage. Better yet, let them live up to their own rhetoric when they hire their legions of working poor — let them be treated like “family.”

    Tina Dupuy is an award-winning writer

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
71.96-0.14(-0.19%)Jun 24 4:01 PMEDT