Are you saying that negative cash flow could not possibly be an issue that would encourage some to short?
There are 1.3 million shares short on this stock AFTER it fell to 17. Why didn't at least some of them cover? I'm not the only one who is concerned about this, TLWatson brought it up originally. I'm the first to admit I'm new to this game (otherwise I wouldn't have paid so much for my ANLT).