SMART MONEY STARTED TO MOVE INTO EPCT LAST WEEK.
SMART RETAILS SHOULD FOLLOW SMART MONEY AND GET IN AT THESE BOTTOM PRICES FOR A RIDE OF ONCE IN A LIFETIME !!
Disclosure: EPCT long, please do your own DD.
Status: Ongoing, Recruiting Patients
This is an open-label, multiple-dose study in subjects with glioblastoma multiforme. The primary endpoint for this study is 6-month Progression Free Survival (PFS) compared against historical control. The secondary endpoints include overall response observed over a maximum of 18 months of follow-up and overall survival. This study is being conducted at 10 sites in the US.
Visit clinicaltrials.gov for more information:
Just found this on the myrx site:
"Azixa has also been shown to act as a VDA in a mouse model of human ovarian cancer . Thus, Azixa has a dual mode of action; it induces apoptosis and acts as a VDA, resulting in tumor cell death. VDAs have been established to reduce interstitial pressure in the tumor microenvironment which may increase local exposure to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Consistent with this hypothesis, Azixa acts synergistically with the chemotherapeutic agent carboplatin in this mouse model of ovarian cancer. Accordingly, we believe Azixa has the potential to be used either in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapies or as a single agent"
Note that it does say Azixa may act synergistically with other agents but not by means of preventing resistance in the tumour to the agent - which would be very important in the case of temozolomide since that typically works for a while but then the cancer becomes immune to it.
"It would be wonderful if Azixa really did work synergistically with Temozolomide, enabling it to be more effective by preventing resistance. This is implied in the translation but I don't think it can be correct. Is this what you meant to say?"
Yes, that's what I am saying.
Our 100% own Crinobulin is another VDA. It enhaces the efficacy of the combination drug. Same story. By the way you have the same outcome (but not process) with Ceplene: IL-2 gives side-effect but do not have efficacy after a while. Together with Ceplene at a 10% dosage IL-2 will have efficacy - again.
It would be wonderful if Azixa really did work synergistically with Temozolomide, enabling it to be more effective by preventing resistance. This is implied in the translation but I don't think it can be correct. Is this what you meant to say? We do know that Azixa seems to thwart the cancer's ability to develop a resistance to Azixa, but I've never heard that it prevents the cancer from developing resistance to other drugs too.
Exciting ideas but without confirmation just flights of fancy.
Thanks. That is much more hopeful! It would be great to get some confirmation of that in the upcoming conferences. The real confirmation though would come in terms of a move in myrx's stock price which has not moved in recent weeks and is ridiculously low if Azixa really does work.
For the benefit of others, here's the translation of your message:
"Gunnar Mine 09-05-06 18:17:43 Report Post
How have you there with the webcast from Myriad?
I had not seen the change in Myriad's website. There is a presentation at AACR two weeks ago on Azixa and combination therapies against human brain tumor cells implanted in mice. Slides with images page after page. Do we get these results in Phase II, we are already rich. :-) The results show "complete inefficiancy of tumor growth", according to author lectures on webcast. Mice and humans, we have these results in humans?
Our muttering rapporteur says, if you listen closely, the study of metastases in the brain (the major diagnosis with 170 000 patients per year), that patients' Stabel disease or partial response "in" over 50% "of patients. Temozolomide is the name of the combination medicine. Azixa allows the patient does not develop resistance to it and that it may appear more concentrated in only the brain. (Myriad, other techniques to reduce the side effects of medication, an area that streamlines dosgivningen.)
You read about this study:
The study was extended in December -08:
"This trail is continuing," according to the rapporteur of the Myriad.
The change of dosage - more Azixa and less temozolomide-occurred in September -08:
Testing has rolled in three quarters of new doses. Looking at trends? Yes, as above: "Stabel disease" and, even better, "partial response". Over time, this may provide even stronger response as a given graph of the patient population. "
I wrote this att www.di.se after relistening to the webcast:
"Gruvgunnar 09-05-06 18:17:43 Anmäl inlägget
Hur har ni det med webcasten från Myriad?
Jag hade inte sett förändringen på Myriads hemsida. Det finns en presentation på AACR för två veckor sedan om Azixa och kombinationspreparat mot inplanterade mänskliga hjärntumörceller i möss. Slides med bilder sida upp och sida ner. Får vi dessa resultat under fas II är vi redan rika. :-) Resultaten visar "complete inefficiancy of tumor growth", enligt föredragaren på webcasten. Möss och människor, har vi dessa resultaten på människor?
Vår muttrande föredragande säger, om man lyssnar noga, att studien mot metastaser i hjärnan (den stora diagnosen med 170 000 patienter per år) har patienterna "stabel disease or partial respons" i "over 50%" av patienterna. Temozolomide är namnet på kombinationsmedicinen. Azixa gör att patienten inte utvecklar resistens mot den samt att den kan verka mer koncentrerat i bara hjärnan. (Myriad har andra tekniker för att minska sidoeffekterna av medicinering, ett område som effektiviserar dosgivningen.)
Man läsa om studien här:
Studien förlängdes i december -08:
"This trail is continuing", enligt föredraganden från Myriad.
Förändringen av doseringen - mer Azixa och mindre temozolomide -skedde i september -08:
Testerna har rullat i tre kvartal med nya doser. Ser man tendenser? Ja, enligt ovan: "Stabel disease" och, än bättre, "partial response". Över tiden kan detta ge än starkare svar enligt en given kurva över patientgruppen."
The translation of the essential part ( " har patienterna "stabel disease or partial respons" i "over 50%" av patienterna.")...is that patients with stabel disease or partial respons (=better) is together over 50%.
I remember that I was relistening several times. This is of course to be taken for what it is worth. It's my writing the same day as the webcast was held. You can find it May 6th at the adress above, "börssnack", "gruvgunnar".
I listened to that one too and agree that Adrian Hobden, the CEO, did point to some positive things about the trials beyond stable disease, but from the posters on the Phase 1 trials stable disease is the best you can find. I'll try to listen to Hobden's presentation again to see if there is anything substantive there.
As for the efficacy in the phase I, I'll be back on that. (My memory, the nearly none existing, says that the efficacy were more than stable disease in the webcast I refered to.)
Just logical resoning here:
Add to that said in the earlier post the start up of a new phase II against primary tumors. Expensive if there is no effecacy in the ongoing trials.