you really are such a twit....what kind of answer do you want when your questions start with name calling, Baggie? F off Marcy, go change the world somewhere else...maybe we can all go to a shooting range. You can be the target, we'll use paint balls because we are compassionate. You're just a message board #$%$ who sells dope to kids. I don't have assault weapons, just anti-assault weapons. Your King sent real assault weapons (F16s) to your sponsors at the Muslim brotherhood. I know you support arrming radical islamists, admit it....
Yet you premice your thread with an insult and generalization of gun owners. Bagger????
Seriously, if you are going to complain about people insulting you don't throw out an insult to start with. You complain about how people call you names here, yet you come on a S&W board to instigate trouble.
What is it with you Leftists that you always have to instigate trouble and muddle any rational conversation? It's like you purposely set a confrontational tone to reduce the discussion to childish banter. I guess that is what happens when you know that you are on the losing side of things and know that you would lose on the facts. Just destroy the argument and hope that the confusion somehow gives you a break.
If only you were smart enough to know how your role models have manipulated you. Maybe you should go read "Rules for Radicals" by Saul Alinsky to see the #$%$ you have been falling for? Fat chance of that though.
Exactly. Piers asks every advocate why they need their AR15. The response should be to tell him that it's none of his business what they need or don't need. His premise seems to be that since nobody can prove a valid need for their AR15 (Piers being the judge of validity) that it should be banned. That's a ridiculous premise and one that would ban anything beyond food, water and oxygen.
I like your simple statement - "It's a bill of rights, not a bill of needs". Gun advocates need an eloquent speaker to make this point on CNN to shut Piers up once and for all.