you are viewing a single comment's thread.
the data you point out are relating to studies with small numbers.... the first involved 14 people. I am not sure I would use that to conclude that 64% is teh figure.
you are a moron and are clueless when it comes to medicine and diagnostics!Frank
I am trying to contribute to the board and you are insulting me. there is no need to be so touchy and defensive, let alone abrasive
Frank, you are correct. Also include statistical analysis, effect size, and statistical power...... N=14 ain't jack