One thing Inovio investors can be assured of is if Inovio's results are something short of stellar,.. A.F. will be publishing his normal hit piece to basically say "I told you so..... and to all of the doe-eyed Inovio investors....here's a thumb in your eye!!"
If the results are statistically significant & set a firm foundation for advancement of VGX-3100, but something short of stellar... he will likely seek to twist the results (i.e. in normal, conservative terms,.. **LIE**) regarding the significance of the results....
The big question is... if the results are solid,..... is A.F. MAN enough to admit he made a bone-headed statements in his prior hit pieces.... wherein he attacked the science,... Dr. Kim,... and Inovio investors??
Shall we expect a mea culpa??
My speculation... he won't because AF isn't man enough to admit when he's missed something by a mile.... If pressed,.. he'll contrive up some lame a*s execuse.... and then go on to make an even more stupid prognostication.....
Are you listening AF?? How about for once demonstrating some integrity and humility??
I think results will BE stellar, But, I also believe the Adam Fs' of the world will be Spinning it down with Scientific double speak. Other authors probably fake, Medical experts probably paid, will flat out lie and say the results aren't that good. Alll in attempt to get coverage as cheap as possible. but, they won't be able to stop it from going up. The first days after though Might be a strange up down up down ride. But I think after the smoke clears and all accounts are settled up, we go up big time. Some where between 20 and 30 pps is my guess. From there , over the next few years ? who knows higher for sure.
hard to say.....I agree with you on your initial analysis which if they results aren't stellar, well, this idiot will come full bore on it....and well, why not...that is what he is paid to do....on the other hand, if the results are borderline, expect the same treatment as this give him room for the short and distort crowd to still say "I told you so"....finally, if there is NO question of success from the results....hmmmm....I seriously doubt you see any "manning up" because this thing is simply not a person......or a man for that matter..... : D
AF did own up on mannkind so i wouldnt get your panties in a bunch just yet. all the longs shouldnt fret over AF (assuming they are actually long and not pump and dumpers) because hard data - positive that is - cannot be twisted by AF, and he wouldnt anyways.
AF was right on vical, gtxi, and a few others. he isnt all bad.
I have no problem with the likes of AF when he ends up correctly identifying potential issues that will likely end up in some degree of failure for a particular company. But when he took that Dr. Kim interview and read so much into in beyond what was actually said, and then added "falsehoods and misrepresentations" with "malicious" intent, my respect for his "professional" analysis and opinions went out the door. I'm surprised he didn't glean who killed Kennedy from Dr. K's interview.
I wouldn't trust the guy as far as I could throw him.
he's a philosophical catalyst: should one befriend evil as to stay out of harm's way, fight righteously, deviously eliminate at the first opportunity, or is he just an action piece in this particular puzzle..If you want to help him ask him about his childhood. If you want to hurt him, ask him about his childhood. :)