French Biotech Body Rejects Results of Study on Monsanto Corn Last update: 10/22/2012 6:17:28 AM
French Biotech Body Rejects Results of Study on Monsanto Corn
Last update: 10/22/2012 6:17:28 AM
By Inti Landauro
PARIS--A French biotech advising body Monday rejected the findings of a study carried out by a French university linking an increase in rat tumors with the feeding of a genetically modified corn made by U.S. multinational agricultural biotechnology firm Monsanto Co. (MON).
The High Council of Biotechnology, an independent state panel which advises the French government, said in a statement Monday that the study is unable to prove a causation link between the increased rate of tumors and feeding with the corn because of flaws in method.
"The Council's Scientific Committee concludes the study doesn't bring supportive scientific information about the identification of a sanitary risk," the statement said, while recommending further investigation.
The advisory body backs Monsanto's dismissal of the study, which was released last month together with shocking photos of lab rats showing huge deformities presented as tumors. The U.S. biotech firm has been struggling for more than a decade to get its genetically modified seeds authorized in France, even though they are widely used in countries such as the U.S. and Brazil and authorized in the rest of the European Union.
The High Council of Biotechnology statement comes hours before the French food safety agency is scheduled to release its official position on the study.
The French government has said it could seek an immediate ban on European Union imports of genetically modified corn.
The September study, which recommended further research, was received with skepticism by many scientists.
France has been in dispute with EU partners over another variety of genetically modified corn made by Monsanto. French authorities have been blocking its use even though it was authorized in the rest of the EU, and even though the Conseil d'Etat, France's top administrative court, ordered the ban to be lifted.
I understand that MON and others biotech firms studies lasted only 3 months so results are not RELIABLE in that term, but if studies contemplate longer period of time, for sure we , consumers and ELSE can have a reliable opinion, and what I know is that French results were obtain after a period of studies for 12 months and longer. THAT SHALL BE STATED before confirming any positive or negative results.
lol, if you got what you wanted, you would just complain 'for more' to further your mindless agenda! No one wants to apologize for the blatant abuse in the French trial, that most experts say was flawed. I doubt the FDA would have ok'd it and again supported GMO last year, if they had not weighed it carefully on the scales of knowledge and common sense.