Wed, Dec 17, 2014, 3:41 PM EST - U.S. Markets close in 19 mins.

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Diamond Foods, Inc. (DMND) Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • carchandco51 carchandco51 Dec 5, 2011 10:06 AM Flag

    What is the fundamental value??

    I don't understand why they would abandon the contracts. Contracts are made to insure supply and price for the buyer and lock in a profit (hopefully) for the grower. You sound like they owe the growers a "do over", makes the growers appear to victims and or idiots. Never contract all your production unless you are very comfortable with the terms.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • The difficulty with the contracts began during 2010 when walnut
      prices surged higher by about 25% and remained higher than what the
      company or the growers considered might happen. So yes the growers are
      locked into contracts, however, they see that they are missing out on
      substantial profits seen by growers without a contract. If something
      is not done to respond to their concerns, they have the option of not
      remaining as suppliers to Diamond when their contracts do expire. So
      after considering the way things work in the real world, Diamond has
      already made one additional payment of 50 million that was not
      required under the contract. When growers received the payment it was
      not documented as to which crop year it was applied to, and somehow it
      led to the turmoil we see now.

      When I make estimates about this effect, the shares look significantly
      undervalued. The worst case scenario that I can imagine, would be for
      the company to give in completely and move the 50 million into 2011,
      and then promise the growers that they will make this 50 million
      extra payment each and every year from now on. I am not saying I
      expect that to happen, but assuming a worst case just to make the
      calculation easier. That would increase their operating cost by 50
      million, but after completion of the Pringles transaction, the earnings
      would still be expected to be about 2.1 per share. The current share
      price in my view is pricing in the worst case outcome to this
      situation.

      I wrote more about this and submitted it to seeking alpha, but they
      are asking for some revisions. They may have it out later, or else
      I'll post more about it here.

 
DMND
26.98+0.41(+1.54%)3:40 PMEST

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.