you are viewing a single comment's thread.
No where does it say the exps were ever recorded it just says they were not reported in the correct period which "could" include never reporting them.http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1320947/000119312512046902/d297426d8k.htm
To add insult to injury, the sec filing says they could find other accounting problems!http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1320947/000119312512046902/d297426d8k.htm
I'm starting to think this looks like a deliberate short attack.
" were not accounted for in the correct periods" and not accounted for" means the same to u? sorry but not for me... the audit board uses words ' payments to growers" payments means expense to me ..
they could of hung the payments up on the balance sheet and never hit the income statement. I don't think anyone knows the absolute details of how the transasctions went. We need more info.....