Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Research Frontiers Inc. Message Board

  • allrefr allrefr Aug 18, 2012 1:06 AM Flag

    more from Joe

    on the recent conference call Joe mentioned that Gkn has shown SPD to commercial airlines.
    there is no better company to supply Boeing with the fix for their Dreamliner then the company that ALREADY supplies them with the outer windows for the 787.

    no need for the downer clowns to respond. you are all on ignore.
    i have a pet rock that is smarter and does better dd then the clowns on this board.

    excuse me, i have to go 'back up the truck', again.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Personally I have always been excited about the technology. I witnessed how well it worked several years ago at the Indiana University Medical Center and several auto shows. I can’t believe you would accuse me of being greedy because I wanted to make some money on my investment. Why did you invest in REFR? Yes, I’ve been patient I’ve owned the stock for 6 or 7 years with negative returns. Maybe it’s Joe and the BOD you should be accusing of greed. While the stockholder was losing share value they continued to collect salaries and stock options. I’ve sold off most of my position and made about half of my lose back in AAPL in several months. Again, I am excited about the technology and I’ll get back in should it start to move, but I’ve heard enough of empty promises. GREED….give me a break.

    • usga, that was a wonderful summing up. What I don't understand from the bashers is why they would be against a new technology that will dramatically enhance the environment and bring money into the U.S. economy. Oh, could it be greed? They can no longer deny the existence of this magnificent tech. All they have left are stupid arguments that emphasize the paucity of their thought.

    • Looks like there is a boiler room of these new id's harping

      on the same theme. They must be getting very desperate to

      try and create new id's to shield the fact they are the same

      people. Mention Joe and you are sure to get a negative response.

      The great thing is that it does not matter what Joe or anyone

      else at RFI "says" but what our licensees accomplish. As long

      as the licensees are churning out SPD products, then RFI is

      going to be receiving royalty income. There is no doubt that

      new OEM's are coming online. We can find that out on our own.

      By the way, why is Ford mentioning SPD in a new patent

      application?

      • 2 Replies to usga2008
      • >>Looks like there is a boiler room of these new id's harping

        on the same theme. They must be getting very desperate to

        try and create new id's to shield the fact they are the same

        people.<<

        As I recall about three years ago nati took the time to travel to Indy, video the newly installed spd glass at Indiana University and then post that video on the net. That video is being used today by some websites to demonstrate the functionality of spd and its existence which at that time was still being highly questioned. In fact, this was one of the few videos to show the real life function of spd glass in a commercial environment.

        Don't you find it rather odd or down right shameful that others not connected to rfi other than possibly being investors that receive no income, spend more time trying to promote the use of spd glass in the real world more than those employed at rfi that do receive compensation but refuse to do any heavy lifting.

        Why don't you do a survey and find out how many of those long term investors really don't take the current action of the stock price seriously?

        Understand where posters are coming from with their views before you criticize everyone that shares an opposing view.

      • >>>>> Mention Joe and you are sure to get a negative response.

        The great thing is that it does not matter what Joe or anyone

        else at RFI "says" but what our licensees accomplish.>>>>>

        Your licensees have a long history of failure.

        However, the great thing is not what your licensees accomplish, but what the total return to the investor is.

        REFR has paid no dividends so far, (in spite of being a royalty collecting/dividend paying machine), so calculating total return is simple.

        Just divide the recent share price by your purchase price. Yes, you should include commissions, and also taxes, and even inflation.

        Pretty easy to see that the majority of REFR "investors" are under water.

    • I believe your truck is full of Joe's BS. Great announcement after great announcement means nothing when the stock can't break $3.

 
REFR
5.99-0.01(-0.17%)May 22 3:59 PMEDT