Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Aeterna Zentaris Inc. Message Board

  • franwurl franwurl Dec 16, 2011 3:47 AM Flag

    The Best Explanation I can suggest

    The best explanation I can suggest for the actions of AEZS and KERX yesterday may be inane, but here it is anyway. Some time ago, I think it was on the KERX M.B., Ockerfan suggested that hedge trades had been initiated based upon the premise that the capitalization of the two companies would approach each other. Indeed, this has been the case. The difference in capitalization narrowed yesterday to less than 20% from an earlier almost 100% difference.

    If this hedge strategy had been initiated about two months ago at a time when KERX was around 3.15 and AEZS 1.75, the price spread would have been around 1.4. One would have initiated the spread by shorting KERX and buying an equal dollar amount of AEZS. Yesterday, the price spread narrowed to around .90 and AEZS fell about 7% while KERX fell a little more than 2% suggesting the spread had been or was being reversed.

    So the best explanation I can suggest for the actions of these two stocks the last week is not the sovereign debt crisis having impacted them or insiders selling because of inside knowledge that PCAP had failed. Simply put, it may be that earlier hedges were being reversed. What do you think?

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Franwurl; we enjoyed with different recruitment models issuing - given some parameters - PCAP works.
      PCAP DOES work, just by looking at Ph2 Data.
      The problem here is "Is possibly control arm doing better or even the same?". In second case would be futility-level.
      As final ph3 data approach my mere stress turned into doubt after BPAX debacle (which I'm writing below). The definitive matter for this is the DBSM board.
      Forget the bashing articles on SA by that AF... it's actually a favorable point (he's missing every happening lately).
      I put together these facts:
      - AEZS' insiders aren't buying, after almost -50%
      - KERX' CEO sold at 6$ and didn't buy back after a -60% since then
      - first KERX' major holder dumped 4/5 pack
      - now this BPAX debacle really bashed my consideration about DBSM

      We all know every stock dove after market crash in july.
      But Consider this.
      http://investors.keryx.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=122201&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1601818&highlight=
      After last DBSM recommendation, (8/31) both AEZS & KERX have seen a slow going down.
      I'm starting to see it better.

      In conclusion, I've dumped hard KERX and sliced 2/3 AEZS.
      This because AEZS has great pipeline.
      In worst scenario, we'll see a -60/-80% in KERX and no worse than -25% for AEZS.
      Many catalyst ahead, so many way to buy back.

      Still in.
      7.000 AEZS
      2.000 KERX.

      Still Hope for the best.
      ------
      BPAX Debacle:

      I've been beaten down for 2 days after BPAX'libigel failure as I was in. My intention (as most there) was leaving after STELLAR efficacy data releasing. Verdict: futility. No difference between arms.
      So one question for you and the MB entire: what is the DBSM board supposed to do?
      It Is an indipendent subject for futility and safety valuation. Why after SIX (S*I*X!!!) recommendation they didn't stopped the trial? 3 expensive trials?
      I really can't understand this... if you only can....

      • 2 Replies to leuname75
      • An innoecent trial like for libigel, isnt a main issue for the DSMB, antineoplastics are. The decision to proceede was a positive event, ONTY got the same and has performed well thereafter. Look around, many if not most small pharmas are down 50 percent and it takes comittment to sit over trials, so many just simply sell due to stress overload. Market doesent give you lots of money, one have to earn them by putting on risk, and its a stressful endeavour. During market downturns we can buy the very best prospective drugs on the cheap, thats why I have exposed myself to Perifosine and Ganetespib from Synta. These are drugs that will excel in targeted therapies fot the years to come. And play with the big boys like Pfizer and Roches inventions.

      • Good points which I would love to hear rebutted by knowledgeable posters.

        The only rebuttal I can offer is that the BPAX trial was aimed at a vastly different medical problem, a problem which has been notoriously resistant to drug based intervention of any kind. Comparing the two trials is an apples/oranges exercise.

    • What you described wouldn't be a hedge and there wouldn't really be an arb opportunity. The two companies are just valued differently.

      Sure, hedge funds are trading in the sector, thats a given.

      Whats more likely is that due to the serious, down right disastrous nature of the Europe (yes folks, the eurozone is done and the currency can and will collapse) is creating an environment of de-risking, de-leveraging and when margin calls everything that isn't nailed gets sold. No one really wants to hold risk right now. AEZS, KERX are risk assets.

      Second, the recent meltdowns in the bio sector (and not just BPAX) have prompted traders to reduce risk and exposure to tail end events.

      People, your going to get killed, time and time again holding through trial results. Mathematically, percentage wise and factually the amount of HOMERUN top line readouts Dendreon, Human Genome type style rocket rides are few and far between.

      I'd be careful here and especially with a sleep of rating downgrades of Europe debt that kicked off at 5ish tonight with Belgium. Those downgrades are what triggered Lehman to get collateral calls.

    • That Is what JR tweeted yesterday. Except he said he spoke to people. Do you have insight onwho those people are? I am assuming you two shared this idea.

    • Yesterday in his live chat A. Feuerstein bashed KERX and AEZS predicting again perifosine trial failure. Could contribute to decrease in PPS.

    • christianegeskov@rocketmail.com christianegeskov Dec 16, 2011 4:14 AM Flag

      That is a very plausible theory. Actually thought about iy myself wehen I could not sleep last night.

      But like always.....we are only guessing.

      Are you still in deep? I am with 107.500 shares. A lot of money for me, but I feel pretty comfortable long term. My only regret is that I dont have the means to buy more if P fails and we take a fall sub 1 buck.

      Best of luck to the true longs!

      By the way...Yesterday the board was infested by "new" longs concerned about data etc....coincidence? I dont think so.

 
AEZS
3.83-0.09(-2.30%)1:33 PMEDT