So you claim StockExpose has been here 6 years instead of the 2 1/2 years he says and any regular reader of the board knows is accurate.
So after he explained what was going to happen and how shareholders were going to get wiped out by a restructure (and if none then bankruptcy) the stock went from $3,300 to $6.
But you say he was here "bashing" as you call his analysis for 6 years. Six years ago, March 2007, the stock was fluctuating around $300,000 ($293-$318k pps). Not $3,300 but $300,000. 900% higher.
So you are saying that stockexpose was 900% more correct on the stock than stockexpose is earned by posting his analysis "bashing" in your twisted world.
So the guy you spend your life bashing on here for years. Who you post about in the wee hours on a Saturday nights and holidays. This guy according to you is 9 times more accurate on the collapse of YRCW stock.
So your bashing point is that stockexpose is 900% smarter/more accurate.
Wow. Let's see who is dumber than that. The baby with Jimmy Fallon that doesn't want more money?
Oh wait. He's a baby. You are just dumb.
Oh wait. You are going to whine about adjusted prices. Ok lets use pre reverse split prices.
Instead of the stock going from 0.44 to 0.009 (under 1/10th of a penny) since he explained what was going to happen. You claim he was "bashing" for 6 years. So the unadjusted March 2007 price was about 40 per share ( a range of 38-42). So again your claim that he has been "bashing" for 6 years makes him look 900% better than his already stupendous record (the stock dropping over 99% in 2 1/2 years after he explained what was going to happen). Instead of $40.0 to $0.009 instead of $0.44 to $0.009.