So, more info came out on man made impact to the climate. Will the usual suspects still deny we have involvement? Get the talking points out - Fox News can assist you with this. Keep polluting and make sure you live long enough to have your kids and grandkids thank you personally.
AMERICANS ARE CONVINCED CLIMATE CHANGE IS CONNECTED TO STRONGER STORMS, POLL SAYS
11/22/2013 | Emily Swanson | HuffPost
Most Americans think climate change, and more frequent and severe natural disasters are linked, according to a new HuffPost/YouGov poll that also finds most think human activity is at least partially responsible for the changing climate.
According to the new poll, conducted after Typhoon Haiyan devastated the Philippines earlier this month, 55 percent of Americans think climate change is related to more frequent and severe natural disasters, while only 23 percent do not.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
Yes, but they still have no proof. Climate is the DEFINITION of change. Anyone who believes fossil fuels, or cows farthing determines the strength of a few storms needs their head examined. Earth worshipers have their own religion...."whacko envirnomentalism", I think it's been called.
right you are M858.....NYC and Philly under water, no biggie. Non breathable air, you should be rich enough to live in a bubble. No clean water, no worries as you should be rich enough to hire an army to guard your private water supply. Where the heck do you think this is heading if we keep polluting the air and water?
One way or the other 44 of the computer models used are not near to reality. Oh it was the ocean, oh it was El Niño,oh it was cow farts. They flat out do not know how climate works. 8 th grade carbon cycle, nitrogen cycle, etc doesn't apply when millions of $in funding for consensus is at stake. Is it the CO2 or not? They don't friggin know
Macaq, all the top scientist in the world agreed on the fact that humans were causing a global climate warming through the pollution of the atmosphere, even the scientist that the Koch brothers hired to refute it, came to the scientific realization that the world scientists were correct.
Too bad your mind is so closed, but there's lot of ignorant folks, like you, out there, so you're not alone.
Right Cricket, good name, as you are in the dark on this. Must be nice thinking you can pump #$%$ in the air and not have an impact on the environment. As I wrote, make sure to live long and tell your kids all about your believe and their grandkids as well, as they'll look at you in complete bewilderment for having been part of the problem.
CLIMATE PANEL: 'EXTREMELY LIKELY' MAN IS DOMINANT CAUSE OF WARMING
IPCC Climate Change Report Expresses Extreme Confidence In Human Cause Of Global Warming
AP | KARL RITTER | 09/27/2013
STOCKHOLM (AP) — Scientists can now say with extreme confidence that human activity is the dominant cause of the global warming observed since the 1950s, a new report by an international scientific group said Friday.
Calling man-made warming "extremely likely," the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change used the strongest words yet on the issue as it adopted its assessment on the state of the climate system.
In its previous assessment, in 2007, the U.N.-sponsored panel said it was "very likely" that global warming was man-made.
ONE OF THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL SUBJECTS IN THE REPORT WAS HOW TO DEAL WITH A PURPORTED SLOWDOWN IN WARMING IN THE PAST 15 YEARS. CLIMATE SKEPTICS SAY THIS "HIATUS" CASTS DOUBT ON THE SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS ON CLIMATE CHANGE.
MANY GOVERNMENTS HAD OBJECTIONS OVER HOW THE ISSUE WAS TREATED IN EARLIER DRAFTS AND SOME HAD CALLED FOR IT TO BE DELETED ALTOGETHER.
IN THE END, THE IPCC MADE ONLY A BRIEF MENTION OF THE ISSUE IN THE SUMMARY FOR POLICYMAKERS, STRESSING THAT SHORT-TERM RECORDS ARE SENSITIVE TO NATURAL VARIABILITY AND DON'T IN GENERAL REFLECT LONG-TERM TRENDS.
"AN OLD RULE SAYS THAT CLIMATE-RELEVANT TRENDS SHOULD NOT BE CALCULATED FOR PERIODS LESS THAN AROUND 30 YEARS," SAID THOMAS STOCKER, CO-CHAIR OF THE GROUP THAT WROTE THE REPORT.
MANY SCIENTISTS SAY THE PURPORTED SLOWDOWN REFLECTS RANDOM CLIMATE FLUCTUATIONS AND AN UNUSUALLY HOT YEAR, 1998, PICKED AS A STARTING POINT FOR CHARTING TEMPERATURES. ANOTHER LEADING HYPOTHESIS IS THAT HEAT IS SETTLING TEMPORARILY IN THE OCEANS, BUT THAT WASN'T INCLUDED IN THE SUMMARY.
Stocker said there wasn't enough literature on "this emerging question."
The IPCC said the evidence of climate change has grown thanks to more and better observations, a clearer understanding of the climate system and improved models to analyze the impact of rising temperatures.
"Our assessment of the science finds that the atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amount of snow and ice has diminished, the global mean sea level has risen and the concentrations of greenhouse gases have increased," said Qin Dahe, co-chair of the working group that wrote the report.
The full 2,000-page report isn't going to be released until Monday, but the summary for policymakers with the key findings was published Friday. It contained few surprises as many of the findings had been leaked in advance.
As expected, the IPCC raised its projections of the rise in sea levels to 10-32 inches (26-82 centimeters) by the end of the century. The previous report predicted a rise of 7-23 inches (18-59 centimeters).
But it also changed its estimate of how sensitive the climate is to an increase in CO2 concentrations, lowering the lower end of a range given in the previous report. In 2007, the IPCC said that a doubling of CO2 concentrations would likely result in 2-4.5 C (3.6-8.1 F) degrees of warming. This time it restored the lower end of that range to what it was in previous reports, 1.5 C (2.7 F).
THE IPCC ASSESSMENTS ARE IMPORTANT BECAUSE THEY FORM THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS OF U.N. NEGOTIATIONS ON A NEW CLIMATE DEAL. GOVERNMENTS ARE SUPPOSED TO FINISH THAT AGREEMENT IN 2015, BUT IT'S UNCLEAR WHETHER THEY WILL COMMIT TO THE EMISSIONS CUTS THAT SCIENTISTS SAY WILL BE NECESSARY TO KEEP THE TEMPERATURE BELOW A LIMIT AT WHICH THE WORST EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE CAN BE AVOIDED.
Using four scenarios with different emissions controls, the report projected that global average temperatures would rise by 0.3 to 4.8 degrees C by the end of the century. That's 0.5-8.6 F.
Only the lowest scenario, which was based on major cuts in CO2 emissions and is considered unlikely, came in below the 2-degree C (3.6 F) limit that countries have set as their target in the climate talks to avoid the worst impacts of warming.
"THIS IS YET ANOTHER WAKEUP CALL: THOSE WHO DENY THE SCIENCE OR CHOOSE EXCUSES OVER ACTION ARE PLAYING WITH FIRE," U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN KERRY SAID IN A STATEMENT. "ONCE AGAIN, THE SCIENCE GROWS CLEARER, THE CASE GROWS MORE COMPELLING, AND THE COSTS OF INACTION GROW BEYOND ANYTHING THAT ANYONE WITH CONSCIENCE OR COMMON SENSE SHOULD BE WILLING TO EVEN CONTEMPLATE."
At this point, emissions keep rising mainly due to rapid growth in China and other emerging economies. They say rich countries should take the lead on emissions cuts because they've pumped carbon into the atmosphere for longer.
Climate activists said the report should spur governments to action.
"There are few surprises in this report but the increase in the confidence around many observations just validates what we are seeing happening around us," said Samantha Smith, of the World Wildlife Fund.
The report adopted Friday deals with the physical science of climate change. Next year, the IPCC will adopt reports on the impacts of global warming, strategies to fight it and a synthesis of all three reports.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
Roy W. Spencer received his Ph.D. in meteorology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1981. Before becoming a Principal Research Scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville in 2001, he was a Senior Scientist for Climate Studies at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, where he and Dr. John Christy received NASA’s Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal for their global temperature monitoring work with satellites. Dr. Spencer’s work with NASA continues as the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite. He has provided congressional testimony several times on the subject of global warming.