Since Gary became CEO on Dec 14, 2010, the share price is down 322.58%
It went from 0.20 per share on Dec 14, 2010, to 0.062 per share on Nov 09, 2013. Yet, he recieved a raise this year, putting his salary just over $1M. Hmm, there's something rotten in Denmark going on here, wouldn't you say?
The pumpers say its the DILUTION ..LOL Exactly!! a LOSS is a LOSS for Shareholders 99% since ipo. MORE LAWSUITS on the way more than likely..Thats okay to lose 99? ..its the dillutions FAULT..LOL They DILUTE because they LOSE money and have NO other way to finance except thru the sheep here. DONT contribute to these PAID pumpers/insiders ..let them GO UNDER..
Now Keep do you want to also include the dilution that took place in order to settle the outstanding lawsuits that were pending due to the TOXIC financing deals that the old CEO entered into in an effort to keep ACTC ALIVE, so that they could get to the FDA APPROVED IND's which are currently on-going?? Your obsession with Gary leads me to believe that you were jilted by him, or he beat your pants off at a Poker Game in the past!
Djam, don't you find it distrubing that ACT hasen't made a dime after being in business for almost 20 years?
And wouldn't you like having a job where you recieve pay raises and stock options w/o producting squat?
And I don't need to play poker against a WS shyster to lose money, as I am down 60% with ACTC. How much are you down?
They all ignore that most of the loss is from the dilution - all ya have to do is look at the market cap to see that Doesn't make it any less aggravating but puts things in a clearer perspective. Concern now has the be the need for additional dilution and what cold be done to avoid that.