Elk, what debate? As I've continually supplied facts for my believeing that Gary should not be CEO & Chairman of ACT. And the only refutes I get back are Gary said this, or Gary said that, or being called a basher, eventhough I've let it known to all that I own 250K shares of ACTC. I deperately want ACT to succeed, both for my own personal greed, and the great good it'll do for mankind, if they can cure AMD & SMD.
Keep and Garie met for coffee and Donuts today to discuss Garies possible leaving and end line results since Keep is the biggest shareholder/bagboy here with over 20,000 posts/shares...FP wasn't even invited..O how the mighty have fallen..Let us know Monday Keep...Snap snap..
I personally believe Keep's last pint about Dr Lanza may have merit for this reason.
Executive management is holding Dr. Lanza contract open as a threat to counter lawsuits as Dr. Lanza is the "inventor" of technology and can assert pressure on any acquirer that may do so under threat of winning lawsuits. Just a guess but has some traction ---Keep asked why--this may be the reason but as always chime in----except for Assphukeeers.
I would like to see where Keep made any comment like that. For the second year in a row, he has opined that Gary is trying to force Lanza out - the reason being that Gary wants to take credit for all of the innovation at the company. Absurd on it's face.
I do agree with you Kry and that would be a smart tactic.