Look at this ignorant #$%$-what a stupid post as usual-who asked you to comment ftcuking moron. If you don't know the subject be quiet-you constantly make an a ss of yourself. Go plagiarize another MB on another thread-c/p queen! Stay away!!!!!
"Hawkins says now there are no black holes."
Fighter, thats because he doesn't about know you, the blackest of all black holes, where light will never shine on the facts, but a place where fiction reigns supreme.
They are Black Stars...and the notion that light can't escape its gravity may be stretching the truth a bit. Visible light is a very small part of the spectrum, you could see it from the other side an consider it rare to see a star at all (not the star, the phenomenon of visible light). The stars emit huge amounts of x-rays and gamma rays at the poles, they may emit other energies at a broad surface/coronal level but not visible (to our eyes) and in a spectrum unfamiliar, or undetectable with our instruments, and/or possibly in phase which creates cancellation and nodes rendering the massive object invisible.
This was apparent to me when I was a child and is a paraphrasing summary of a paper I had written so many years ago. I remember reading some years later that 'scientists were shocked to find x-rays and gamma rays beaming from the poles of Black Holes'. I was not shocked, it was as I had expected it to be, but then again, I knew they were stars, not holes.
I know how planets and stars form too. It's simple, makes sense, doesn't require fantasy micro-gravity anomalies which only occur in the presence of space dust and pebbles, and all the recent discoveries that have left planetary scientists scratching their heads and modifying their theories are confirmations and validations of my theory.