Info, this whole was most likely fabricated by the folks who write misleading trash for Seeking Alpha. It took two plus articles to move ACTC's price up, and one negative article to start bringing it back down. And thats because in the WS math world, one negative is worth two positives, when deciding which way they want the stock to move. It's both manipulative and dishonest, but it's the way things work on WS, as the need for greed rules absolutely. Remember; the Golden Rule of WS is those that have the Gold Rule.
Likely to go green, the article in SA was exactly wrong. Look at the slide presentation, the patents cover RPE's derived from ANY source of pluripotent stem cells. Looks like the juco flunkie didn't bother trying to brush up on reading once he learned the alpha bet.
Seems like SA tries to aqcuire new customers. This article makes absolutely no sense in relation to these in January. All the facts were on the table and TLD are still not published yet. This behaviour of SA might be a criminal offense. What intention could one have to publish completely opposed opinions within two weeks? Very strange, but somewhat successful?
I don't have any problem with different viewpoints. My biggest complaint is that todays article and the one on Jan 26th is the basic analytical issues. One's uses an unnamed expert for the basis as his analysis, and the other uses his "instincts" for his view. Just an absurd basis for both articles. How credible is either article with those foundations? Crazy.
Pretty sure the ones that sold below .075 are already freaking out. I've been where they're at and done the exact same thing in my younger days. Sucked then and I'm sure it sucks just as much now if you're on the losing end of the stick. Everybody's gotta learn, and some learn the lesson the really hard way. Just the way life works.