Here's the bottom line. None of the sky is falling predictions the global warming kooks have made have come true. The polar caps aren't melting. The hurricane season haven't been catastrophic. Not all glaciers are melting and according to NOAA the Earth hasn't warmed in the last ten years. In fact it has been cooling.
This should tell you something but it doesn't. The facts should speak louder than your bogus studies. And yes NASA has been faking the figures. Just do a search on "NASA Global Warming Hoax"
Now as far as the 97% lie:
"Climate Scam – 97% Of Climate Scientists Are In Consensus, Is A Lie
Posted by Tory Aardvark
77 earth scientists out of 10,257 earth scientists invited replied, so how do they get 97% consensus
The next UN Climate Religion Synod (COP17) in Durban is just 10 weeks away, and despite almost universal consensus that Climate Change talks will slide off the precipice and into oblivion, the drones of the Church of Climatology are still pumping out the sound bytes that are only believed by Climate Activists and those with power and money to gain.
Typical of the Climate Religion drones are the journalists propagandists at the Guardian who are claiming that most of the world is irrational, a lacklustre effort to spin the massive decline in belief in Climate Religion and many more stories of approaching climate Armageddon.
Underpining all of these fairy tales is the dead horse of More than 97% of active climate scientists are in consensus:
The small number of climate scientists actually supporting the Al Gore/IPCC claims of catastrophic global warming and the actual AGW “predictions” has always been a major embarrassment. As a result, the left/liberal/greens have been forced to fabricate bogus support that can’t stand up to any form of scrutiny.
First, it was the claim that 2,500 IPCC-related scientists agreed with the 2007 IPCC report. Soon afer it was discovered that the actual number of scientists who actually agreed with the report contents was only 25.
Next, when the 2,500 shrunk to 25, a couple of University of Illinois researchers conjured up a 2-minute online, anonymous survey that they hoped would deliver some big numbers to crow about. They solicited 10,257 earth scientists and only 77 chose to answer the online survey (yes, only 77). 75 of those “climate scientists” agreed with the survey’s two questions (yes, only 2 questions).
Voila, the infamous and widely publicized “97%” of climate scientists (75 divided by 77) who thought man was the cause of global warming turned out to be a numeric joke.
As a side note, in order to assure an initial high survey percentage, the two researchers did not ask major segments of the scientific world to participate. Those would be the segments that were known to be critical of the AGW theory, including: solar scientists, space scientists, cosmologists, physicists, meteorologists and astronomers."
Re: ".. Not all glaciers are melting and according to NOAA the Earth hasn't warmed in the last ten years. In fact it has been cooling. .." by poleonutt
THE RIGHT-WING PRESS' NEW CLIMATE CHANGE LIE
No, global warming is not on "hiatus"
By Rebecca Leber | New Republic | 8/10/2014
Norman Loeb, an atmospheric scientist with NASA, gave a crash course in climate change science for the public at Virginia Air and Space Center on Tuesday. HE TALKED ABOUT ALL THE EVIDENCE THAT THE PLANET IS WARMING—LIKE THE FACT THAT TEMPERATURES RIGHT NOW ARE THE HOTTEST THEY’VE BEEN SINCE RECORD-KEEPING BEGAN IN 1850. HE ALSO NOTED THAT THE RISE IN SURFACE TEMPERATURES HAS SLOWED CONSIDERABLY SINCE 2000. THIS DOESN’T CONTRADICT THE THEORY OF GLOBAL WARMING, HE EXPLAINED. LAND TEMPERATURE REGULARLY VARIES, AND MUCH OF THE WARMING IN THE LAST DECADE IS HAPPENING UNSEEN IN THE OCEAN.
The same day, the frequently conservative-leaning Washington Times ran a short story on the talk. It said that a prominent NASA scientist had admitted global warming is on “hiatus.” As the writer explained, “The nation’s space agency [has] noticed an inconvenient cooling on the planet lately.”
It was pretty much the opposite of what Loeb was trying to say. But it’s not an isolated incident. CONSERVATIVES LOVE TO CITE THE RELATIVE STABILITY OF GLOBAL SURFACE TEMPERATURES FOR THE LAST 15 YEARS AS PROOF THAT CLIMATE CHANGE IS A HOAX. AND THEY FREQUENTLY TWIST THE WORDS OF SCIENTISTS TO DO IT. I read or hear versions of this argument all the time—from outlets like Forbes, National Review, and Fox News. SOMETIMES THE CONSERVATIVES EVEN TALK ABOUT “GLOBAL COOLING,” JOKING THAT MAYBE WE SHOULD BE MORE WORRIED ABOUT THAT, INSTEAD. THIS SORT OF COMMENTARY PROBABLY HELPS EXPLAIN WHY STILL FIND THAT JUST 67 PERCENT OF AMERICANS ACCEPT THAT HUMANS CAUSE CLIMATE CHANGE, EVEN THOUGH THERE IS NEARLY UNANIMOUS SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS.
NEEDLESS TO SAY, THE CONSERVATIVES HAVE IT ALL WRONG. AND THE SCIENCE REALLY ISN’T THAT HARD TO UNDERSTAND.
The key thing to understand is that changes in global temperature don’t occur at a steady pace. It’s why climate scientists don’t only look at a single decade’s worth of temperatures. Loeb explained all of this in his presentation. And the Daily Press, a local paper that actually attended the presentation, relayed the explanation correctly. TEMPERATURE CHANGE, THE NEWSPAPER’S ACCOUNT SAID, LOOKS MORE LIKE A “STOCK MARKET GRAPH, WITH JAGGED UPS AND DOWNS BUILT INTO A LONG, UPWARD TREND.” THE LONG-TERM TREND IS CLEAR, DESPITE THE HIATUSES.
Indeed, scientists expect the rate of warming to slow for extended intervals. That’s because of the internal complexities of the climate system, where factors like solar radiation, volcanoes, El Nino, water vapor, and winds all play a role. Meanwhile, even as temperature on land is zigging and zagging, it has kept rising in the seas. Ninety-three percent of the Earth’s heat is absorbed in the ocean. And there the warming trend has actually accelerated.
Scientists expect to see decades of little temperature rise between decades where there is rapid temperature rise, because of the internal complexities of the climate system, where factors like solar radiation, volcanoes, El Nino, water vapor, and winds all play a role.
This is how scientists talk about climate change, in nuances and observations. It’s those nuances that lose many people when talking about climate change. But if you want a simple takeaway about the long-term trend, science can tell you that, too. Yes, it’s getting hotter. And burning fossil fuels is causing it.
After seeing the story, I got a hold of Loeb on the phone. He was frustrated and disappointed with the way his talk had been portrayed—and upset that his profession hasn’t been able to win over more of the public. “I have a hard time communicating this,” Loeb said, as he took me through his slideshow presentation. “I’m a scientist.”
Sentiment: Strong Buy
Lonesome: Always good to see someone post the truth about the man caused global warming fraud. As John Coleman, founder of the weather channel pointed out, some 9,000 PhD's have signed a petition stating that the idea of man caused global warming is not true. But this fraud has been taken over by the socialists/communists who see it as a way to control almost all aspects of everyone's live, and also as a way to loot the developed countries in favor of the poor of the undeveloped world, and so they will not give up this fraud. The control and look aspects appeal to the UN and its many petty tyrants and to our socialist/communist President, and to their dupes , like Elk. The loot and control elements also appeal to our mostly dishonest socialist main stream media. Hopefully the lies of the left will be overcome, since these leftists mean to use this fraud to destroy freedom and prosperity in the developed countries if they can.
CLIMATE CHANGE PLACES GOP’S SCIENCE DENIAL IN PERIL
Tim Ferrell | Newslo | July 6th 2014
WASHINGTON — Republicans are scrambling to save one of their platform’s most valuable assets: science denial.
According to a recent bipartisan report issued by senior officials from the Reagan, Clinton and Bush administrations, the dangers associated with climate change will cost the U.S. economy trillions of dollars.
For decades, the GOP has prided itself on completely disagreeing with the most basic scientific findings. Its steady contradiction of academic studies has helped the party win countless races from the local level on up to the United States Senate.
Now, the principle of science denial — which conservatives have relied on so successfully in the past — is in danger.
“We have several strategists on the case,” said RNC Chairman Reince Priebus. “One possibility, which we’re strongly considering, is to once again convince the public that the Earth is flat. After that, it should be pretty easy to paint liberals as ‘those hoity-toity round-earth elitists.’
“Painting half the country as your enemy is crucial to maintaining power,” he added, demonstrating his math-denying abilities.
SENATE MITCH MCCONNELL, R-KY., WHO HAS A REMARKABLY CONSISTENT TRACK RECORD OF DENYING REALITY, DID NOT MINCE WORDS.
“ONCE THE MIAMI AREA IS UNDERWATER, I DON’T KNOW HOW I’M GOING TO CONVINCE KENTUCKIANS THAT IT ISN’T,” HE SAID. “ESPECIALLY WHEN ALL THEIR COUSINS FROM FLORIDA HAVE COME TO LIVE WITH THEM.”
DAVID BRAT, THE TEA PARTY CHALLENGER WHO RECENTLY UNSEATED HOUSE MINORITY LEADER ERIC CANTOR, R-VA., WAS PARTICULARLY DISMAYED.
“FEIGNING IGNORANCE OF CLIMATE CHANGE WAS ONE OF THE CORNERSTONES OF MY CAMPAIGN,” BRAT TOLD NEWSLO. “IF I CAN’T DRUM UP THE SAME KIND OF DELUSIONAL FERVOR NEXT TIME AROUND, I’LL BE A ONE-TERM CONGRESSMAN.”
Still, some well-established Republicans, such as Senator James Inhofe, R-Okla., are tightly holding onto their science-denial roots. Inhofe has repeatedly called global warming a hoax, often citing the Bible as his source.
“This gravy train hasn’t let me down yet,” said Inhofe. “Like my steadfast belief that only God can change the climate, I have complete faith in the illiteracy of the American people.”
Sentiment: Strong Buy
polecat, you are all wet. You can pick and choose any short time period you want to prove your point but if you look at a global temp chart over the last 80 years the trend is definitely up. There are short periods where it levels off but then stars trending back up again. NOAA temperatures are right; it is you that is wrong. While the temps have leveled off and declined in the last couple of years NOAA predicts the temp will rise in 2015.
robcelot: The reason the fraud of man caused global warming will not die is because the socialists/communists have adopted it as part of their plan to loot the developed countries in favor the poor undeveloped countries (which are mostly ruled by authoritarians like rule so many UN member states). Also this fraud is a useful tool to control almost all aspects of everyone's life, so the socialists love it for that reason also. It has been refuted and its frauds shown repeatedly, but that makes no difference, it offers to the enemies of freedom such broad vistas of power and personal wealth that it is irresistible to them. Here , again, Lonesome has shown another fraud of the wormers and look at the dupes who come to the defense of the warmers' fraud without any attempt to show Lonesome to be wrong in his explanation of the warmers false statement about what percentage of scientists support this fraud. The fact is that some 9,000 phds have signed a petition opposing this fraud.
rob, you mean like the predictions that the ice at the poles would melt away or the prediction that hurricane seasons would be progressively more violent? So far the predictions have been nothing but hot air, lies, fudged data. Yet you and your loony pals believe them.
All those "hurricanes" were brief but (your words)
Hurricane Sandy, a historic storm makes landfall near Atlantic City, New Jersey with 90 mph winds. This storm was unusual because it was a late season hurricane combined with a Nor'easter at high tide during a full moon, producing long lasting and devastating results not seen in generations. The largest hurricane ever recorded in the Atlantic Basin,
In other words, this is new- not your grandma's hurricane, tornadoes or tsunamis. Not seen in generations-thanks
What about the extreme drought in Texas and California. Or the extreme weather in Asia. You want to deny climate change because of political reasons. I agree there is some hyperbole (by politicians) about how soon and how dramatic the changes will be. The fact is burning fossil fuels releases carbon into the atmosphere which through the green house effect traps heat, Humans have been burning MASSIVE amounts of fossil fuels for over 150 years. Where do you suppose all that carbon went? Why not explore alternatives?
So I'm lying about the polar caps not melting and the hurricane season being mild? Aren't the real liars the loons that predicted the caps are melting and the season would be violent? And how about NASA and NOAA fudging the figures? Weren't they lying?