Darren, What is most important to you: an old trend or a more recent one? if you think that a two year slide in a stock that ended a year ago is more important than a 56% rise in two weeks then I no longer wonder why a mental midget like yourself finds the NTN message board on Yahoo so fascinating.
Darren, If you were an IBM investor, for example, what would mean more to you...... that IBM was down 50% from 1992 to 1994, or that IBM is up 30% in two months. Obviously the recent trend is more relevant. If you dont agree with this than you have really established yourself as the NTN mental midget.
Where is the news we should be selling on? We are up 56% now in less than 2 months. not a bad return!