<<'condone' what? pass a law declaring homosexual relationships to be 'legal' or 'illegal'? bwhahahaha! stop prying into other people's lives, mo-fo.>>
As usual, you're THICK AS A BRICK.
> homosexuals want me to condone it through a law.
'condone' what? pass a law declaring homosexual relationships to be 'legal' or 'illegal'? bwhahahaha! stop prying into other people's lives, mo-fo.
your main problem is your puritan 'ethics' (that's an oxymoron if I've ever heard one!) have been exposed for what it is: fearful bigotry.
"then you have zero basis for knowing and no right to demand an answer. ""
I sure as hell have a right to demand an answer when homosexuals want me to condone it through a law. GET IT?
Answer it, pal- or shut up.
"TO" people I "KNOW".
I always call you and braboy homosexuals. Is that derogatory? Why should it be? Aren't you proud to be homosexual?
You see, I will extend courtesy to anyone when I meet them- If some jack-off challenges me and shows me no respect on a msg board- I will reiprocate. So stick that in your pipe and hump it.
> Why does a homosexual desire another homosexual? What purpose does that serve?
then you have zero basis for knowing and no right to demand an answer. nobody needs your 'permission' for anything. go thump your bible along with the other bigots.
<<9. I make derogatory remarks like "f@ggot" or "queer" to people I suspect are gay. >>
Well, shouldn't that be a yes or no question, rather than degrees of agree/disagree? I don't make any remarks like f*ggot or queer TO people that I suspect are gay, or even know are gay. So I must have answered disagree. Let them be gay, it's their prerogative. I've said that a million times on this board. They don't bug me and I don't bug them.