Finally, the Washington Post speaks out on Obama! This is very brutal, timely though. As I'm sure you know, the Washington Post newspaper has a reputation for being extremely liberal. So the fact that its editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama in its newspaper makes this a truly amazing event and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President and his obvious socialist agenda are starting to trickle through the protective wall built around him by our liberal media. I too have become disillusioned.
A brilliant commentary out of none other than the Washington Post.
18 Jan 2013
Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's most powerful military, execute the world's most consequential job? Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer"; a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote "present"); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.
He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor"; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor.
Thank you posting this message.. I read the article one of their reporters had written. I guess I did not have the guts you have I passed I could have just seen Dzee and alias's and buddies would had had a field day.
The President is a pathological liar period. He is leading our great nation into Bankruptcy. He only seldom leaves the boundaries of the US. Of course vacations excepted. We have major armed threats today and all he is worried about is the non-existant budget. Our debt exceeds our gross domestic product by 2x and climbing. We have far to many good people unemployed never hear a word about those poor folks. The highest number on food stamps since the program was started. He is worried about guns I look at the crime in his home town over 400 murders gang murders you think those killers are not going to be able to get guns. Again thank you appreciate yor post.
It's getting much harder for the Lame Stream Media to keep covering for this president's lies. Obama's approval numbers are falling because many people are finding it difficult to except what the president is presenting to them as being factual. More people are abandoning the liberal media because of the outrageous stories that they present to the American viewers. They're shouting and screaming of prolific lies are making many people think twice about the facts. Lame Stream News Networks are losing viewers profusely to Fox News.
No mystery here,
Most of the female vote. Women are the majority.
100% of Communist Vote
100% of the Islamic Vote
100% of the Socialist Vote
70% of the Jewish Vote
100% of the Labor Vote
100% of the Illegal Vote
Sentiment: Strong Buy
Oy vay iz mir! If you go to 235 W. 23 St, NYC, Communist Party Headquarters, you can spend the day counting how many people go in and out. It will be rare that more than ten people do so. There are damned few Communists or Socialists at present. The Islamic vote is also very small. teh labor vote includes many union members who vote GOP because of their attitude.
Obama won because Romney ran a dumb campaign and because peopel feared his agenda more than Obama's.
Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard - because of the color of his skin.
Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?
Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.
Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin - that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is.