the amount of garbage on this board is amazing. Most good posts simply point us to sites where evidence can be found. It was evident from the name and number that the "adull" who targeted Dan was bogus. However not all phonies are as easily spotted. A month or so there were a rash of posts claiming birth defects in the Neuvax trials. This morning while researching "A37" which is being tested in the many of the same clinics as neuvax and is under the guidance of the same Doctor(Peoples). I found that one of the exclusions for the study is a positive urine preg. test. It was common sense that there would be such exclusions, but the bashers were adamant that birth-defects were a problem. The shorts will do anything to destroy value in this stock. While one poster last week said we are all investors, maybe we all are, but some of us have a moral code. I have no problem with a legitimate short. However to spread false and misleading information on either side of a stock(especially bio-pharma) is wrong and can be damaging if life-saving technology is involved.