Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Alphabet Inc. Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • political_ganster political_ganster Oct 24, 2012 10:17 AM Flag

    The Three Google Billionaires Stooges Schmidt Page & Brin are Obama Biggest Supporters for Political Faver

    Many Ohio - Michigan - Florida - Pennsylvania Democrats Switching to Mitt Romney for President

    Women Review Debate 3, Governor Mitt Romney Pasted The Test, Ready to Lead USA
    By USA_Jewish_Women 10 22 2012

    Debate 3: Women's Review: President Obama Was Arrogant, Disrespectfully Angry Condescending to Governor Mitt Romney on Oct 22, 2012.

    Mitt Romney's Stunning turnaround in these past 3 debates

    Obama has lost support among Jewish women voters.

    Most Jews are Turn Against Obama across the 50 states,

    A Jewish Women Focus Group of 7,890 on October 22, 2012

    President Obama Was arrogant, angry, disrespectfully, condescending and much to aggressive, did not look very presidential at all.

    Governor Mitt Romney looked much more presidential, ready to be commander-in-chief. America he said, needs a strong economy in order to have a strong military for our National Security now and in the future.

    We came away from this debate with a very good impression of Mitt Romney, in that he would be a “ a safe pair of hands.”

    We feel he’s tough enough to do what’s necessary, but laid-back enough not to do too much and get us into another war. Romney did not attack President Obama's policies, he simply pointed out a few improvements in a respectable way.

    During the debate Governor Mitt Romney seemed more like the president and Barack Obama more like the candidate and challenger.

    Governor Mitt Romney was calm, thoughtful, relaxed, steady and looked very presidential. He looked and acted ready to take the job as commander-in-chief. Expressed his views on Iran's Nuclear threat and the USA support of Israel, our good friend and ally.

    He impressed us tonight, in that a vote for him is a vote for American security, peace and safety, a strong economy, a strong military, millions of higher paying jobs, prosperity and quiet peaceful life for us and our families.

    The world is much to scary these days; Americans aren’t looking for a scary weak president.

    Tonight we came away with the feeling that President Obama is more the scary one, in America's weaken relationship with Israel, a closer to Nuclear Iran, our weak economy and the huge 16 Trillion Dollars in Debt, that in itself Threatens our National Security.

    We can not afford four more years of president Obama's spending and borrowing another 5 or 6 trillion dollars from countries like China. Our jewish women's focus group therefore endorse Governor Mitt Romney for the next president of the United States of America.

    Obama's Re-Election is very questionable. Vote for Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • faith_destiny@sbcglobal.net faith_destiny Oct 24, 2012 10:35 AM Flag

      PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED CURATIVE INSTRUCTIONS
      1. Instruction Regarding The Disney-Google Agreement
      Members of the jury, yesterday you heard counsel for Defendants ask Dr. Becker a
      number of questions during cross-examination regarding a patent license agreement between
      Disney and Google. Defendants were trying to establish that the technology of the DisneyGoogle Agreement is comparable to the technology of the patents-in-suit that I/P Engine is
      asserting against Google and the other defendants. The Court has ruled that the technology of
      the Disney-Google Agreement is not comparable to the technology of the patents-in-suit. As a
      result, the Court instructed you to disregard all testimony regarding the Disney-Google
      Agreement. You may not consider that agreement, or the amount of that agreement, for any
      purpose, including trying to determine what the appropriate royalty should be in this case.
      I want to emphasize that my instruction to you on this matter is in no way a reflection that
      Dr. Becker did anything improper. During his direct examination, Dr. Becker testified that he
      was not relying on the Disney-Google agreement because there is no evidence that the Disney
      technology is relevant to any issue in this case the questions of Defense counsel regarding the
      Case 2:11-cv-00512-RAJ-TEM Document 740-1 Filed 10/24/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 160891
      Disney-Google agreement were improper. The Court has therefore ruled that any evidence
      regarding the Disney technology is improper and irrelevant.
      2. Instruction Regarding Discovery of Google’s Financial Information
      You also heard counsel for Defendants ask Dr. Becker questions regarding whether he
      had asked counsel for I/P Engine for further documents or information to support his opinions
      regarding his apportionment, or whether there was a final version of PX 64, the Revenue Force
      document. After reviewing the record on this matter, the Court has found that counsel for I/P
      Engine had requested those documents and information from Google, but that Google did not
      produce to I/P Engine a final version of the Revenue Force document, PX 64, or any documents
      providing the numerical support for the slides on page 38 of that document. I instruct you that
      you may conclude, based upon the cross-examination questions asked of Dr. Becker by
      Defendants’ counsel, that Google had additional documents and information that, had they been
      produced, would have provided further support to Dr. Becker’s opinions regarding his
      apportionment.
      Sentiment: Buy
      .2 users liked this posts 0 users disliked this posts ReplyIgnore User | Report Abuse ..View Replies
      Re: Re: New PACER Doc - Interpretation anyone?
      By harpolerichard . 26 seconds ago . Permalink
      .OK. So the way I read this: The Judge rules that the Disney-Google technology agreement DO...

      OK. So the way I read this:
      The Judge rules that the Disney-Google technology agreement DOES NOT-IS NOT the same as the tech infringement Google is being sued for. Judge instructs Jury to disregard Becker testimony
      specific to this agreenet as it is not comparable specific to tech and settlement amount...this is nothing but a BIG POSITIVE for Vringo.

      Google was trying to 1. Say it was the same tech and 2. The damages should be similar if applicable....read between the lines...Goolgle is saying we are guilty but this is what we would like to pay.
      .0 users liked this posts 0 users disliked this posts ReplyIgnore User | Report Abuse ..Re: New PACER Doc - Interpretation anyone?
      By marinedelray . 7 minutes ago . Permalink
      .Yesterday the judge struck the cross examination of VRNG's expert. Striking testimony ...

      Yesterday the judge struck the cross examination of VRNG's expert. Striking testimony after it has already happened is not ideal. He really shouldn't have allowed it in the 1st place. So now the judge has to give a curative instruction, something to the effect of "you will disredard..." All still an indication that rulings went in VRNG's favor yesterday.
      .0 users liked this posts 0 users disliked this posts ReplyIgnore User | Report Abuse ..Re: New PACER Doc - Interpretation anyone?
      By nick.henny . 7 minutes ago . Permalink
      .basically the judge threw out this testimony...which is good for VRINGO because GOOG was t...

      basically the judge threw out this testimony...which is good for VRINGO because GOOG was trying to use this to limit the damages for their infringement.
      Sentiment: Strong Buy
      .0 users liked this posts 0 users disliked this posts ReplyIgnore User | Report Abuse ..Re: New PACER Doc - Interpretation anyone?
      By bbondslf25 . 1 minute 47 seconds ago . Permalink
      .This is re-confirmation of yesterdays news... becker's cross examination was striked.....

      This is re-confirmation of yesterdays news... becker's cross examination was striked... so judge is telling jury to disregard it...( curative)

 
GOOG
766.77-2.87(-0.37%)10:38 AMEDT