Surely if he thinks responding to the subject line of a thread are your words, then the avatar he chooses are a reflection of his lifestyle.
Good job, Yank. And welcome back, horsedoo....nice dress.
Time to man up, there, wussie-boy. Time to confess that you lied about earnings per share and now you continue to lie about it. You challenged my assertion that Walgreens employed a gambit to kite earnings PER SHARE via an accelerated share buy back. You said the buy back had no impact. But it did. Didn't it, "runs"?
Walgreens employed a shabby and highly questionable PLOY to skew Q4 numbers. And no amount of subterfuge by you or the ivan-ettes can prevent the truth contained in the recent 10K from seeing the light of day.
Truth is, WAG made their numbers with hard work, and good management - two things that are unfamiliar to you.
Truth is, I commented on revenue, a concept completely foreign to you.
Truth is, had you implemented the trading strategy I suggested, you too would have made a boatload at earnings, instead of losing your shirt (127,000 naked short, remember??)
So, since you made the wrong call, it MUST be somebody else's problem - not yours, right?
Maybe the DR acquisition was a great deal, after all, but you'd never admit that, right?
Yep, Walgreens is the worst money making operation under the sun! Those horrible executives in in Deerfield just keep on making us shareholders cash, quarter after quarter, year after year, through recession and in good times, too. How dare they!!
Ah, Yank, you're truly one of a kind, and not in a good way, either. You're lack of understanding of all things business is so obvious.
The author of this post cannot provide financial advice. The author of this post is not, nor does he represent himself to be, a registered investment advisor, broker, or dealer. Readers should independently verify all statements made on this post. All prices shown must be taken as indicative. This post is intended for informational purposes only and you, the reader should not make any financial, investment, or trading decisions based upon this post’s author’s interpretations of anyone's stock picks. Any investment should be made only after consulting with a qualified investment advisor and doing your own homework, including but not restricted to, reviewing the publicly available financial statements of the company and verifying your appropriate risk tolerance with a qualified investment advisor. A qualified investment advisor can help you determine your own risk tolerance and whether it is appropriate for you to invest in securities. Investing in securities involves significant risk and can result in a loss, not limited to, the original capital invested. Past performance of stock prices is not a guarantee of future results. Furthermore, past performance of any of the author’s interpretations of anyone's stock picks or any trading strategies, backtested systems, or other calculations devised from these interpretations, does not guarantee future performance of these methods. THIS POST IS NOT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY SECURITIES MENTIONED. THE AUTHOR ACCEPTS NO LIABILITY FOR HOW READERS MAY CHOOSE TO UTILIZE THE INFORMATION ON THIS POST.
Sure thing, there Aesop. But I digress.
So you claim to own all that Apple stock you bought at $10? But you don't post on the AAPL message board. Only on the WAG message board. 24/7.
But I will admit AAPL has been a better investment than Walgreens over the last decade. So has AMZN, Or just about most anything else.
Why do you keep pumping, defending and lying about Walgreens to cover up its crumby investment performance?