Castle Resorts & Hotels� Senior Vice President Alan Mattson says his properties are participating with the main online travel sites, too. �There�s Expedia and then there�s everybody else in terms of volume and ease of use,� he says.
Castle Resorts was the first regional hotel company in the country to launch a private-labeled vacation package in partnership with Expedia. He says online electronic marketing represents about 22 percent of Castle�s total business, a huge jump from 3 percent a year ago.
By the way, other hotels which have turned to Expedia's private label vacation package product for their air/car/hotel offerings online include:
caribbean tourism board -- gocaribbean.com
Airlines using Expedia's WWTE platform to sell hotels on their own website include:
westjet (canada's #2 airline)
"Mattson [SVP of Castle Hotels in Hawaii] believes that Expedia is the No. 1 or No. 2 online volume producer for most regional hotels today.
He says, '[Expedia has] the eyes and ears of all the hoteliers in Hawaii, BECAUSE OF THE VOLUME THEY ARE ABLE TO CREATE.'" [emphasis added]
If Castle Resorts is the first and maybe only hotel to partnership with EXPE, is it surprising that they have nice things to say about you?
<<Airlines using Expedia's WWTE platform to sell hotels on their own website include:>>
Gross distortion. EXPE appears as a popup. Imagine how that must irritate travelers. EXPE receives no income from it or maybe they do the paying.
>> If Castle Resorts is the first and maybe only hotel to partnership with EXPE
But they are not.
First, note that 10,000 hotels now have special rate contracts with Expedia.
If that's not enough:
1) HyattVacations.com is powered by WWTE, which EXPE developed, owns and operates.
2) WyndhamVacations.com is powered by WWTE
3) Sheraton.com's air/car/hotel vacations are powered by WWTE
4) Westin.com's air/car/hotel vacations are powered by WWTE
5) WHotels.com's air/car/hotel vacations are powered by WWTE
6) Hilton named Expedia their "preferred third party internet travel site"
8) Starwoodvacations.com is powered by WWTE
9) Castleresorts.com is powered by WWTE for air/car/hotel vacation packages
These are just the ones I could *find* in fifteen minutes or so of looking around. Makes you wonder how many more are out there...
"<<Airlines using Expedia's WWTE platform to sell hotels on their own website include:>>
Gross distortion. EXPE appears as a popup. Imagine how that must irritate travelers. EXPE receives no income from it or maybe they do the paying."
You don't know what you're talking about. Go to www.jetblue.com and search for hotels in Las Vegas on some set of dates. The search results you see are being sent to your browser by Expedia's web servers. You are no longer on jetblue's site.
<<(I inquired directly to firstname.lastname@example.org as a prospect, and they confirmed that they are revenue share deals.)
In addition, since they actually do the booking, they also get the information about when the booking happened, how much the person spent, etc. They also get to tell the hotels "Do you want to be featured on all these airlines sites? If so, list with Expedia/WWTE and give us attractive cost of goods sold". Pretty powerful.>>
How much does EXPE get out of it, percentagewise? If it is a lot, pretty pitiful, I would say, given how little came down to the bottom line last quarter. On IACI's highly dilutive balance sheet, subsidiary EXPE would have contributed less than $0.02. Once Orbitz gets stabilized, EXPE will get less than a lot and less than a little. They will get nothing.
Lotsa luck with your new properties, IACI.
>>EXPE contributed 71% of IACI's operating income in Q2.<<
That post sort of makes my point. I am concerned when one entity contributes 71% of the operating income of the mega billion dollar IACI octapus. EXPE could arguebly do better on its own. I am not as blown away by the growth potential of Evite, Citysearch, E books, Interval Int. and especially Match.com as some are. HSN, Tree, Ticketmaster, and Room MAY hold their own but even that remains to be seen. I must admit I am surprised at your quote that Match.com is the #1 personals site. Is that correct? Wierd, I have been single for years and never use those sites or personal ads. I guess it takes all.
Match.com is ranked #1 in terms of total membership and site usage, yes.
I take your point, and certainly agree that online travel is the cherry of IACI's properties, but I do think that Hotels.com and Ticketmaster, in particular, have strong growth prospects. Citysearch might also have good prospects as well if they can introduce some kind of paid-search model that local restaurants/retailers/event houses/etc. will actually pay for.
To me, it seems that Ticketmaster should easily be able to introduce a merchant product -- their suppliers, like Expedia's hotel suppliers -- have a lot of the same economic issues. They have very large fixed costs (e.g., theatres, stadiums, etc.) and probably would be happy, on unsold-out events, if they could get just enough revenue to cover their marginal cost (which likely approaches $0 when attendees get into the thousands). Imagine if Ticketmaster could do what Expedia/Hotels.com have each done in the hotel market. They could turn their operating profit per ticket from a couple bucks into 200% of that amount or more...
Also, I believe the international potential growth, particularly for travel, is largely untapped.
Saying Ticketmaster and LendingTree are #1 in their market places is actually an understatement. They completely dominate their market places. And Expedia, with loads of competition, good competition, still nails it's numbers in a SARS - post 9/11 - Iraq war environment. Imagine if the airlines were not going bankrupt and people weren't afraid to travel and unemployment wasn't rising...imagine the day (not to distant future) when disposable income is back for most people. Expedia will knock Ebay off the pedistal.
Diller et al have built a winner by buying winners. God...if he only owned Google...Gates would have serious competition for Billionaire of the year.
>>EXPE contributed 71% of IACI's operating income in Q2.<<
That post sort of makes my point>>
A good point that deserves further analysis.
That means that the ten others in IACI's stable of donkeys COMBINED contributed 29%.
And how much does the shining star, EXPE contribute to IACI's net income quarterly? Less than $0.02. Then all the others combined contribute less than $0.01.
That is what dilution, much talked about on this board, does to you.
And EXPE may or may not grow. I just finished reading an article from 2001, by Forrester, the market research firm. At that time, they were predicting that the airlines, led by Northwest and KLM, were preparing to put web travel agencies at zero commission.
It still hasn't happened yet because two congressmen came to the rescue. Instead, the hotels are tightening the noose now.
That is the kind of vulnerable, cut throat business EXPE is in. And the rest of them in this stable of donkeys apparenly are much worse.
That is the genius of Diller, the media mogul. To be able to fool Wall Street into believing he was putting together something big. To take care of details even to the extent that a full time con artist is working this board..
It is amusing that the retail investors wised up quickly to represent one third of their initial trading volume. The overinvested Funds, however, are finding it difficult to shake off this POS. Apparently, they can only sell to other funds and to do that, it would seem that they must increasingly sell at discount.
True, the GAAP earnings for IACI are much lower than you might expect for a company on course to exceed $1,200,000,000 in cashflow this year alone. And one which is increasing its rate of cashflow generation.
What is going on? Well, IACI has lots of non-cash... NON-CASH expenses that they do on the books. Things like writedowns of the VUE stake, which is likely to turn into cash some day, but whose value until that day remains unknown. Things like RSU's related to the acquisitions of Expedia & ROOM. Things like option expenses. Things like free advertising that was given to Expedia by USAI at the time of the first purchase of share from MSFT, which is expensed each quarter it is used. Things like fairly generous tax reserves, which are built up on the books despite the fact that no such taxes are actually paid out to anyone (nor is there any certainty yet that they actually will be).
Each of these P&L expense items are NOT outlays of cash, nor is it clear that they will some day correspond to outlays or inflows of cash. In acquisitive companies, there are lots of non-cash expenses that happen.
What is interesting to me about this is that in general, the vast majority of "sneaky companies" almost always have cashflow that is FAR LOWER than actual earnings. GAAP earnings are trumped up, but when you do the analysis on cashflow, it is a pittance. In fact, I know of no such large company in the recent record of flameouts where cashflow dramatically exceeded earnings.
There is a reason why the phrase is "Cash is king". Because, it is. It tells a story worth listening to, along with all other factors.
On Wall Street Week this weekend, there was a professor on from the University of Michigan who did a study whose results indicate that companies where cash earnings dramatically exceed GAAP earnings outperform the market over time.
He makes the point that over the LONG run, GAAP earnings and cashflow MUST match. GAAP accounting essentially gives a company the freedom to move earnings between periods (through accruals, non-cash expenses, balance sheet prepaid liabilities, etc.), but eventually, earnings do equal cashflow.
He notes that those companies where cashflow dramatically exceeds earnings tend to outperform the market over the long run. Interesting research and worth a listen if you've got WSW in your area.
>> And how much does the shining star, EXPE contribute to IACI's net income quarterly? Less than $0.02.
Where did you get that number? I get roughly $0.05/share in quarterly earnings, more than twice your figure.
1) EXPE generated GAAP net income of about $41,300,000 last quarter. Source, EXPE earnings release, below.
2) IACI has about 825 million shares outstanding, which is a HIGH estimate after all the dilution events. Source: IACI earnings release.
3) 41.3 million divided by 825 million is about $0.05/share
phdry, correcting your innacuracies is getting to be a little tiresome.
First it was that "WWTE wasn't proprietary". (It is.) Then it was that "WWTE wasn't actually powering the air/vacation and hotel bookings for many major hotels and airlines". (They are.) Then, it was that it was "all based on private market softare", which you refused to name. (It isn't. It's proprietary.) Then it was that "EXPE generates $0.02/share in quarterly earnings". (It's more than twice that figure.)
All posted without any kind of evidence or links for us to fact-check.
Now, you write:
>> At that time, they [Forrester] were predicting that the airlines, led by Northwest and KLM, were preparing to put web travel agencies at zero commission.
It still hasn't happened yet because two congressmen came to the rescue.
Northwest indeed did set commissions to zero, BUT after Expedia turned them off of the site altogether, after about three weeks Expedia and Northwest miraculously came to an agreement. The terms of the agreement were unnamed BUT Expedia indicated that it would be "immaterial" from a profit standpoint. That was over a year ago. During that time, Expedia's earnings have quintupled.
(By the way, Continental also tried the same thing -- and, you got it -- came back to EXPE, and EXPE's profits continued to rise.)
Expedia does more than 100,000 purchase transactions every single day. That is a reasonably strong amount of bargaining leverage. Scale matters.
With all these innaccuracies WITHOUT evidence, I'd say your credibility is waning fast.
That's why I say that it's perfectly legitimate to be short (or long) on any given stock. But don't go spouting off rumors or inuendos without at least a little evidence.