and will bring in some sizable cash for BMGP.
The low is shown as 0.0175. We hit 0.042 today. By my calculation, that is a 147% increase. But I get your point, probably nobody could have made that on paper. But it is what it is. And sorry pink, I didn't notice you have an imposter now. I guess all that ranting was sure to rub a few 'loyalists' the wrong way :)...
we really haven't had much of a bounce yet (not 100%). very little in amount of shares actually traded below that .024-.028 range. I would consider .024 the bottom at the lowest or maybe .028. .028 doubled is .056 and we are not that close at all to that. we've seen maybe a 30% increase but certainly no 100%. maybe one guy has done that trade.
Hey pink, I have no vested interests here as everyone knows. I came here about the same time as you and have seen the ins and outs of this company. As Mark showed, it's not that difficult to put two and two together here. I was hoodwinked with the LANL deal but then figured out that it was just an "investment" by Joe and Clay to make some money by selling stock t bagholders if things did not work out. That's exactly what happened. Though I explained clearly why I got out last Sep, I admit I was plain lucky to get out at 18 cents with some profit. Now, aren't you being disingenuous, 'trying' to call me out after 3 months of non-stop ranting about Clay on this board? Funny what a 100% bounce does to one's psyche. It's the same old crap of a company unfortunately...
Here are a couple from 2008.
So, what exactly was he lying about?