All true but Appel is likely now.I am unclear as to what transpires from here with Cisco as well,
they did not infringe on patents according to jury.Which is a joke,but McKool did seem to really
present a clear cut example to the jurors that they did.How does VHC now get it royalties from Cisco
for the future.Thats the question at hand here now.Which is truly the beating was so bad,it Cisco
and all the others on the fence.
The judges decision on Apple must be one that is convincing that all in fact violate VHC patents,my question
is can judge still impose a ban on infringing products been sold in US if Apple does not agree to come to
some kind of agreement.