Those that gave thumbs down to the initial post must be blind pumpers of this stock. I agree. Nokia would benefit greatly if the 920 was made available on Verizon as well, being I am stuck with Verizon... which is not a bad thing.
Unfortunately, contractual obligations probably is the primary reason for going with AT&T. I just hope some iteration of the 920 will eventually be made available with Verizon, as I would love to upgrade to this phone. My wife wants it too, as she is tired of her iPhone 4 and doesn't see much advantage to upgrading to the iPhone 5.
As for T-Mobile, I don't think they have much of a future. Their reception sucks probably the same as AT&T at least here in Honolulu. Verizon reception, in my opinion, at least here in Hawaii is awesome.
Reason is the agreement from last year 2 year agreement not 5. Samsung will have Wp8 ATVI and Win8ATVI tablet.
Nokia is done in USA. Not tablet puts them at serious disadvantage. Cannot believe they did not have some
It is my understanding that the only reason AT&T would partner with Nokia again was that they have an exclusive smartphone agreement where AT&T would chose what they want to carry and they could choose a smartphone to be there personal marketing tool. Remember it goes back to the 800 series WP as the contract. I think it is a 5 year agreement.