% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Barrick Gold Corporation Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • pascuaforensics pascuaforensics Apr 15, 2011 11:06 AM Flag

    Don't destroy the Glaciers (drinking water)

    Too sad to hear that Barrick has chosen to hurt Glaciers in Argentina, to find an excuse to flee Pascua mining property fraud.

    The Gold never was around the Glaciers and there are technologies that allow mining without such irresponsible mining ways as ABX abdicates for the area.

    Pascua is far away from visible Glaciers in a photo published in Chilean newspaper by Barrick.

    Something again does not add up at Barrick's Pascua Lama farce.

    What glaciers are we talking about here? why Barrick? why Glaciers of any nature's sanctuaries be destroyed un necessarily?

    Chile ore body and logistics are the answer to Pascua and Lama.

    Chile is out of legal bounds to Barrick.

    Its vacuum by pending collapse at Pascua fiasco, will have ABX to leave a huge hole in the metal markets.

    Perhaps that is why to escape so huge losses, the metals price fixers are going to lower physical metal prices to palliate losses... interesting if they actually do it.

    What could the fundamentals for such a treat be?

    Higher Oil prices?
    Higher minerals production cost?
    higher processing and refining costs?
    frontal attack against small & mid miners?

16.92-0.12(-0.70%)Oct 21 4:00 PMEDT