% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Barrick Gold Corporation Message Board

  • pascuaforensics pascuaforensics Apr 14, 2011 10:22 AM Flag

    Just in, Supreme Court of Chile last decision against Barrick et al

    Evidence - Public domain evidence that is - has it that Barrick in actual fact did not win the properties in Appeals 2007 as lied to and via STOCKWATCH by Barrick 2011 v. MWR.

    Evidence has it that Barrick lost the right to lift the currently valid 2001-2011 injunction - preventive Embargoe - over Mina Pascua Camp area and surrounding titles. Meaning lost Mina Pascua itself - at SUPREME COURT of Chile 2008 was ordered out of bounds to Barrick et al to date, why the lies of recovery 2007, Barrick?.

    Why did Barrick only remember interim "silly fought legal stances at Appeals Court 2007?"...

    to only forget at 2011 very crutial SUPREME COURT decisions affecting its Mina Pascua theft 1997-2011, after the ABX's Appeals Court touted pseudo victories of Barrick at Pascua trials? Such ABX & STOCKWATCH lies to the public 2011, constitute criminal deception for the purpose of financial gain. Or, financial terrorism.!

    ABX & STOCKWATCH are urged to withdraw their 2011 criminal treatment of Chile court proceedings, altering the results to favor Barrick and to deceive the investors, public!

    Barrick shall get spanked hard by Chile's judicial and do not blame Chile Laws, blame Barrick's irresponsible management that has chosen public lies and deception 2001 to see if their Pascua fraud could be legitimized.

    ABX built to crash gang of irresponsible miners.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
20.40+0.57(+2.87%)1:24 PMEDT