% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Barrick Gold Corporation Message Board

  • pascuaforensics pascuaforensics May 3, 2011 10:21 AM Flag

    Supreme Court / titles 2011

    1) SUPREME COURT of Chile decisions are also un appealable. That is why Barrick lost 2008 the right to lift up the Injunctive preventive embargoe of MINA PASCUA running 2001 to 2011 against Barrick in Chile.

    2) Mr. Lopehandia enjoys clean and cleared mining concessions with free and full access to the territory.

    3) Is Barrick who is prevented from access to Lopehandia's land, not the other way around as Barrick has zero - zilch - rien - no, land mass possicion right at MINA PASCUA.

    Barrick is indeed from the outside looking in at PascuA mine area in Chile.

    Is that clear?

    Or do you still want to know more?

    Give it a break buddy, you complaint for the information, and then you refuse to read it objectively.

    Last call to understand it.

    SUPREME COURT OF CHILE rules against Barrick 2008

    Clean Jorge Lopehandia 2011 titles at Pascua are un impeached.

    Is Barrick who lies to you and the public, to have it otherwise.

    That is why Barrick ought to be halted and kicked out of world exchanges like ENRON & BRE-X before them, doing the same hankypanky.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
16.92-0.12(-0.70%)Oct 21 4:00 PMEDT